Talk:Euler summation

Can someone possibly go through and make this article accessible to someone with an understanding of high-school algebra? Heck, I'm an engineer and I can't understand a single word of it. 70.115.134.189 (talk) 16:53, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Inconsistent notation[edit]

It should be E_y instead of of (E,q), (E,q) is not a tuple and the notation is inconsistent anyway.
The E₀ sum isn't the usual (convergent) sum, it is 0.radical_in_all_things (talk) 19:19, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

are q ang y the same thing?[edit]

q is used in (E,q) in the first section, but we don't see it later, and later y is used, although it's nowhere defined.

Are they the same thing? Lockywolf (talk) 07:37, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please add the

Runge-Kutta summation

2A02:908:1986:BA00:3988:C038:DDC2:AB74 (talk) 16:31, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]