Talk:Estuary stingray

Estuary stingray has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 8, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 4, 2010.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the estuary stingray is persecuted due to its supposedly voracious appetite for farmed shellfish, which has contributed to its decline?

Move?[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was page moved per request GTBacchus^(talk) 01:50, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dasyatis fluviorum → Estuary stingray —

Primary common name recognized by FishBase and the FAO, and suitable for article title as it is unique Yzx (talk) 08:54, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Estuary stingray/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: J Milburn (talk · contribs) 16:43, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some thoughts-

mortality is a dablink
- redirected to death
"of a "Trygon pastinaca" feeding" Is this a new name without a description? Or is this name a species previously described?
- added link to common stingray, of which that's an obsolete name
papillae is a dablink
- fixed
"Repulse Bay" Worth a link?
- Added the redlink; it has a Commons category
"not to be the case" Why "to be"?
- changed to "this is not the case"
"the intertidal flats of estuaries and bays, that" If you're specifying which intertidal flats it prefers, lose the comma? Alternatively, if you're describing the nature of intertidal flats generally, change to "which"?
- changed to "which"
"Known parasites of the estuary stingray include the tapeworms Heterocotyle chin and Shirleyrhynchus aetobatidis,[8][9] the nematode Echinocephalus overstreeti,[10] and the monogeneans Empruthotrema dasyatidis and Neoentobdella cribbi.[11][12]" Links? Don't be scared of redlinks.
- links added
"fresh or brackish environments may serve nurseries." Serve as?
- fixed
"Finally, this ray's reputation for damaging shellfish has led to persecution by commercial shellfish farmers.[1]" Howso?
- the source doesn't go into detail; I assume killing them somehow
"This ray is not known to be dangerous to humans.[5]" Feels a bit "tacked on". Also, does it not sting?
- Fishbase only lists it as "harmless". I'll get rid of the sentence until more specific info becomes available.
Category:Fish of Australia?

Sources, images and stability are good. The lead image isn't ideal, but it seems to be the best available at this time. If you're interested in requesting one, this site may not be a bad place to try. J Milburn (talk) 17:05, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey now, I trawled through dozens of Flickr search result pages to find that :) Let me know of further issues. -- Yzx (talk) 08:36, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work, I'm happy that this meets the GAC. Your output is very impressive! J Milburn (talk) 10:27, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. -- Yzx (talk) 18:07, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Estuary stingray. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:03, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]