Talk:Esther Ouwehand

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Publications[edit]

It looks as though the following item, mentioned in this section, is at least rather mysterious. (The reference links to something different, whereas the name in front seems to be completely irrelevant).

Ingrid Weel, "'De politiek is te gesloten'. Esther Ouwehand ", Trouw, February 12, 2007[3]

Maybe there was an article in the mentioned newspaper, in which the person about who this Wp-article is, makes certain statements, but that article seems not (easyly) to be found on-line. Another such an article however is this one: [1]. But that's not really what is usually meant by the word "publication"; it would fit better onder a title like: "In the press". VKing (talk) 04:16, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages.

The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion.

Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 15:17, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Esther Ouwehand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:18, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lesbian categorization[edit]

Where is the evidence that the article's subject is LGBT? On this site, she explicitly says that she is not. Given this evidence, and since the article cites no sources to say that she is, I will remove these categories for now. Astrophobe (talk) 05:23, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]