Talk:Espadrille

Pricing Information[edit]

Hi Kipoc,

Price of espadrilles varies wildly worldwide and people are highly interested to get pricing information of espadrilles naturally. So, External Links containing prices from Manufacturers' level to Retail level could be included at the page to meet the demand of users. This is not for advertising purpose obviously.

Cheers!

117.18.224.166 (talk) 04:30, 4 September 2008 (UTC)David[reply]

The pages are primarily commercial in nature - they do not exist as a pure information source for comparative espadrille pricing. As it stands, the external links I removed provided no real information and exist only to sell a product. As such, reinstating those specific links doesn't seem appropriate in my opinion. Kipoc (talk) 06:52, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kipoc, it would be appreciated if you can take some time to add a paragraph regarding comparison of prices when you don't like to display externel links with prices.117.18.224.169 (talk) 07:27, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Linking the external sites to pricing comparison is not a valid argument in my opinion. Aside fromt hat, I don't know enough about Espadrilles to be able to accurately provide pricing comparisons, so such a section is not something I'd be able to create/edit. I'd be doubtful if a pricing comparison would be appropriate for an encyclopedia. Also, I'd suspect that such information, particularly if the comparison was global, would be extremely open to fluctuation. Kipoc (talk) 07:53, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sellers who are selling at high prices never wants that people know other sellers who are selling same products at low prices. So, high price sellers would like to pay editors to remove externel links from the Wikipedia. Blocking knowledge must not be the policy of an encyclopedia. Little learning is a dangerous thing and editors without sufficient knowledge are also dangerous for mankind. Senior editors of Wikipedia should notice the activities of User:Kipoc carefully. Major69 (talk) 06:39, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Right, well sorry to say but I think that's weak. The fact remains that, as much as you twist the reason for their presence on the web, the links do not provide a knowledge source so their removal is 1) not blocking knowledge and 2) entirely per WP policy. The vague suggestion or insinuation that I am being paid (what a job that would be!) to remove external links is laughable, as is the dangerous for mankind ending. Thanks for making me smile! In the meantime, should you have the knowledge yourself to expand the article in an encyclopedic and appropriate manner, go right ahead - Also, please check out WP:EL to understand wikipedia policy on External Links. Kipoc (talk) 06:52, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Without the names of Pare Gabia, Cotheeka, Espadrillesetc, an article on Espadrille is incomplete jute like the names of IBM, Apple for PC and Ford, Mercedes Benz, Chevrolet, Rolls-Royce_(car) etc. for an article on Car. So, it is clear that User:Petertoledo paid User:Kipoc to remove the names of industry leaders that he considered his competitors. It is a shame for WP project that jobless boys are assigned as editors who can be purchased very easily at low cost. I assume more money will make him remove Donna Karen from the article also! :-)) Major69 (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 04:14, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image[edit]

Could someone please add close-up image, to better see what these look like? Muad (talk) 20:44, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I second that. The current picture is not useful at all, considering you can't see what they even look like. I'd add a picture myself but I don't own any. - Cyborg Ninja 04:57, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Many people use espadrilles?[edit]

I'm from the Basque Country and not many people use espadrilles. I mean, this year is kind of "trendy" to wear heels with espadrilles but they have never been used much apart from very old people who still live in farmhouses and to dance tradicional dances. Honestly, I think that part should be changed. --79.144.166.85 (talk) 19:31, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Classical Jute Espadrille.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Classical Jute Espadrille.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Classical Jute Espadrille.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:01, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Spam: Viscata[edit]

Bearing similarity (but no other relation, as far as I can tell) to earlier discussions about adding external links to manufacturers'/vendors' websites, there have been repeated efforts to add spam links to 'Viscata' in the body of the article and in the See Also section. I get the impression that the anonymous users involved (most recently User:79.145.34.75) aren't aware of how Wikipedia works, and while links to Viscata or other manufacturers should be considered spam, I wanted to add a topic here to try to engage with these users and explain why these links are not relevant or desirable in the article.Tomclarke (talk) 07:05, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Espadrille. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140707083122/http://www.soule-xiberoa.fr/eu/herri-alkargoa/herri-alkargoaren-egitasmueak/industriecommercesartisanat/mauleko-espartina-ateleria.html to http://www.soule-xiberoa.fr/eu/herri-alkargoa/herri-alkargoaren-egitasmueak/industriecommercesartisanat/mauleko-espartina-ateleria.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:36, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Traditional methods, using hemp, video demonstration with transcript.[edit]

The espadrille maker and her work of making footwear with hemp fibers. Tradition in every step https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGgy1mw4nUA

Additional related reference documentaries from the YouTube channel "Eugenio Monesma - Documentales"

HEMP ESPADRILLES. Handmade manufacturing of this FOOTWEAR with fibers and techniques of yesteryear https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHEkgh2WMnI 65.181.12.73 (talk) 21:31, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]