Talk:Equality of sacrifice

A simple quote from — even one of — the references would save it from deletion, but the author of the article has gone to great length to include quotes which are, best, marginally relevant to the topic, while not including quotes where someone uses the term. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 22:04, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Withdrawing deletion request, but leaving OR and bias. Apparently Lee Iaccoca and Adam Smith were quoted as using the term, although not necessarily with similar meaning. (And without any real evidence that they did use the term.) — Arthur Rubin (talk) 22:06, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't understand why the article is subject to OR claims. I started this article, having myself studied Mill and Levi's works. Someone then added information claiming that Iacocca used the term, something I found to be true after a quick research on Google Scholar. Hence, I don't see how any of this information can be seen as having been invented (ie. OR), or even as having a preference towards specific opinions (ie. having bias). Most of the information is true and correctly referenced. If you want my point of view, the main problem arises from the fact that this article is of stub-quality and thus does not provide an in-depth coverage of the topic. As you adequately put it, it simply needs to be expanded and disambiguated (ex. between Iacocca, Smith and Mill) - this article may thus be criticized for being of poor quality and poor coverage, but certainly not for being OR. --m3taphysical (talk) 02:02, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:43, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Equality of sacrifice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120309184058/http://epionline.org/study_detail.cfm?sid=137 to http://epionline.org/study_detail.cfm?sid=137

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:50, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

PanYu Clifford Farm Cashier

What is this photo doing here? 70.79.234.213 (talk) 05:01, 21 February 2021 (UTC)