Talk:Environmental psychology

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Environmental psychology article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Urban studies and planning High‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Environment C‑class High‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cognitive science (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cognitive science, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cognitive scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Cognitive scienceTemplate:WikiProject Cognitive scienceCognitive science articles

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 10 May 2021 and 6 August 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): JilianJoyner.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:43, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

This article is excellent and full of information, but it is difficult to follow for someone who is not familiar with the topic.

Please re-write with more context and a basic summary of the concepts at the beginning.--Outlander 16:15, 22 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

?[edit]

Also, a dentist’s office which is devoid of any patient would also be a meaningless artifact, destined to quietly sink into entropy.

Perhaps it is my ignorance of the subject, but could someone please explain to me what that sentence is supposed to mean? --Deville (Talk) 01:02, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation[edit]

There is a link to [[Development]] on this page that is linking to a disambiguation page. I'm not sure which (if any) of the more specific pages on types of development would be a better link in this context. Could someone please review the choices available and either re-direct the link or delete it? Thanks.—Chidom ^talk 22:25, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barker and Gibson[edit]

I've never heard of Barker. The author mentions "affordances", a concept widely believed to have been coined by J. J. Gibson, who explicitly claimed he invented it. An article on ecological psychology should at least clarify the relationship with Gibson's work.

The connection is being discussed by M. M. Scott in "A POWERFUL THEORY AND A PARADOX, Ecological Psychologists After Barker" ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, Vol. 37 No. 3, May 2005295-329 DOI:10.1177/0013916504270696

Scott also notes that Heft (2001) wrote a book relating Barker and Gibson's work with each other.

Heft,H.(2001).Ecologicalpsychologyincontext:JamesGibson,RogerBarker,andtheLegacy of William James’s radical empiricism. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Maybe either Scott or Heft should be approached to provide better context for this article.

Susiesioux 08:04, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page clarification[edit]

Just in case anyone else is as confused as I was, all of the above comments were brought over from the "Behavior settings" article, which contained some interesting, possibly valuable, but cryptic information. "Behavior settings" now exists as a redirect to "Environmental psychology". --Lockley 21:55, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article is just awful, is anyone actually dealing with it? Many sentences are illogical, biased, and lack references. This bombs. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.216.29.21 (talk) 05:46, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 05:55, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Other contributors[edit]

Its not where this section is now headed on the basis of this diff. It was more informative before, and if continued in this original direction, that would be good. As its stands some of the information about the contributors doesn't quite make sense. This comment is made to draw out an explanation rather than just revert. Eyedubya (talk) 07:43, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I would like to contribute to this page, please review my editing in my sandbox and provide me with any necessary criticism. Thanks

[[1]]

Aaleksanian (talk) 22:28, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I like your contribution, Aaleksanian. Do you have reference sources to add? To be in the article, it needs citations. Star767 00:45, 7 April 2013 (UTC) Thank you. Yes sure I will do the citation and provide all necessary references. Aaleksanian (talk) 01:49, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chapter 6 - University courses[edit]

I find this section odd given Wikipedia's neutrality. Some entries have a clear advertising tone to them. That, and it's somewhat discriminating towards universities that might offer such courses but are not listed here. A chapter that talks the history of the education of environmental psychology is fine, but one advertising actual courses unnecessary. 94.101.2.100 (talk) 14:18, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Environmental psychology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150226084618/http://www.empirijskaistrazivanja.org/KnjigaRezimea.aspx to http://www.empirijskaistrazivanja.org/KnjigaRezimea.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:58, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Content Coverage[edit]

I appreciate the acknowledgment of a shift in focus towards environmental sustainability mentioned in the second paragraph of the article, however, the article never again mentions this topic. I believe that data regarding how contemporary global climate change impacts human behavior would make this article more meaningful and provide more complete coverage of the topic. Fernbush (talk) 00:45, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Out date re field focus - this page needs an overhaul[edit]

Hi everyone,

I'm writing on behalf of a group of international senior researchers in the field of Environmental Psychology. Related to some of the other topics listed here, there is concern among researchers in the field that this page is considerably out of date, and represents the research in the field which more closely aligns with the goals of the field 30-40 years ago, rather than contemporary topics of interest. Namely, if you look at the content of articles in our field's flagship scientific journals (like https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-environmental-psychology/ or https://journals.sagepub.com/home/eab) and the topics of focus at our largest international conferences (e.g., http://icep2021.com/), it is clear that the focus of the field has shifted considerably toward issues like sustainability, coping with and adaptation to environmental hazard risks, and intersections with health and wellbeing. These issues are briefly mentioned on the current page, but should represent the core focus.

For help with the actual content, we are in the process of gathering volunteers in our field to help organize and generate the content that would go on an updated, more accurate wikipedia summary. What do you, the active editors of this page, think of this proposed change?

From the perspective of widely-cited contemporary researchers in this field, the page basically needs a complete overhaul and we are eager to help with these efforts. But, this is not our expertise. Any input you have for if/how to re-organize and update this entry would be greatly appreciated!

Wiki Education assignment: Psychology Capstone[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 May 2022 and 6 August 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Arleenicolee (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Gmcph.

— Assignment last updated by Gmcph (talk) 21:42, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]