Talk:Enrique Peña Nieto

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mex Attorney General accuses Peña of bribery and treason[edit]

The Attorney General (FGR) accuses Peña Nieto of bribery and treason due to evidence against Videgaray Caso and treason due to testimony by Emilio Lozoya Austin. Peña has not been charged, but this should be added to the introduction. I have not done so because of the request that the introduction not be changed without editor consensus. Here is the Spanish-language article from Proceso. https://www.proceso.com.mx/nacional/2020/11/12/la-fgr-acusa-al-expresidente-pena-nieto-de-cohecho-traicion-la-patria-252605.html?fbclid=IwAR0aIrv4bJuNx20ICpGiJvnNDHiYeIsHg1_mAOq-hVopT3q8YlA_r4rVNLk Calmecac5 (talk) 17:27, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Color me shocked!. Still allegations anyway and don't belong to the lead until they are confirmed. (CC) Tbhotch 19:41, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Foreign honours in the lede[edit]

Are those two foreign honours (Italy's OMRI and UK's GCB) customarily awarded to him as head of state of a "friend" country so relevant to be mentioned as early as in the article's lede? And why picking only the British and Italian ones out of a much longer list already reported in the "Honours" section? --37.159.117.116 (talk) 07:01, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Other President's don't include such honours in the lead (i.e. Barack Obama), so I don't see why EPN should include them when they are discussed at length in the Honours section of the article. I will remove it unless others decide to chime in and explain why these should be included in the lead. A.Val.sol (talk) 22:45, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sentence doesn't make sense[edit]

"Global drops in oil prices and economic slowdown of the 2010s rendered his economic reforms moderately successful, which lowered political support for Peña Nieto" - this sentence doesn't make sense. Auror Andrachome (talk) 13:57, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]