The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in order to move to Los Angeles to be an actress, Emma Stone prepared a PowerPoint presentation to convince her parents?
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Pride David (February 1, 2023). "Wikipedia: the good, the bad and the ugly". Poynter Institute. Retrieved February 2, 2023. As we said before, nearly anyone can edit the articles, which means people can sometimes insert misinformation or a silly detail into an article. Here's one example: Someone edited the actress Emma Stone's page to say that she "is a hot American actress with a beautiful smile. In 1987, she fell out of the sky as an angel." This type of page vandalism is usually spotted quickly and corrected.
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report5 times. The weeks in which this happened:
stone recently announced that she would prefer to go by her birth name Emily, rather than Emma. the Wikipedia page should change to reflect this. 81.107.189.48 (talk) 17:42, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, with Emma Stone redirecting to it. I came to this talk page specifically to see how Wikipedians would deal with this conundrum. Should an article about a notable person be of the same name they are most widely known by, or by the name they prefer?
It seems clear to me that in this case Emily's preferred name may win out simply because it is also their birth name. 82.7.129.10 (talk) 22:16, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. Article refers to her full name at start of the text so the title should be changed to reflect her wishes. 78.17.187.225 (talk) 07:32, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not opposed to the change, but we should maybe wait a little before changing her name in the article. It's not yet clear if people are going to call her Emily or stick with Emma. As per Wikipedia's guidelines, an article name may still refer to someone with their old name if people are more likely to associate them with that name (see Cat Stevens/Yusuf Islam's name). We should wait and see how the media and people call her in the next weeks and then decide to change the name or not. Saidjk (talk) 01:12, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Deadnaming hurts. Hektor (talk) 10:48, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
