Talk:Emilio de' Cavalieri

Composer project review

I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class articles. This article is B-class; it could use a works list, more inline citations, and a better indication of where he went after Florence. My full review is on the comments page; questions and comments should be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 15:03, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Emilio de' Cavalieri/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

==Composers Project Assessment of Emilio de' Cavalieri: 2009-02-11== This is an assessment of article Emilio de' Cavalieri by a member of the Composers project, according to its assessment criteria. This review was done by Magicpiano. If an article is well-cited, the reviewer is assuming that the article reflects reasonably current scholarship, and deficiencies in the historical record that are documented in a particular area will be appropriately scored. If insufficient inline citations are present, the reviewer will assume that deficiencies in that area may be cured, and that area may be scored down. Adherence to overall Wikipedia standards (WP:MOS, WP:WIAGA, WP:WIAFA) are the reviewer's opinion, and are not a substitute for the Wikipedia's processes for awarding Good Article or Featured Article status. ===Origins/family background/studies=== Does the article reflect what is known about the composer's background and childhood? If s/he received musical training as a child, who from, is the experience and nature of the early teachers' influences described? ok ===Early career=== Does the article indicate when s/he started composing, discuss early style, success/failure? Are other pedagogic and personal influences from this time on his/her music discussed? ok ===Mature career=== Does the article discuss his/her adult life and composition history? Are other pedagogic and personal influences from this time on his/her music discussed? We could learn where he went when he left Florence, and where he died? ===List(s) of works=== Are lists of the composer's works in WP, linked from this article? If there are special catalogs (e.g. Köchel for Mozart, Hoboken for Haydn), are they used? If the composer has written more than 20-30 works, any exhaustive listing should be placed in a separate article. No works list. ===Critical appreciation=== Does the article discuss his/her style, reception by critics and the public (both during his/her life, and over time)? ok ===Illustrations and sound clips=== Does the article contain images of its subject, birthplace, gravesite or other memorials, important residences, manuscript pages, museums, etc? Does it contain samples of the composer's work (as composer and/or performer, if appropriate)? (Note that since many 20th-century works are copyrighted, it may not be possible to acquire more than brief fair use samples of those works, but efforts should be made to do so.) If an article is of high enough quality, do its images and media comply with image use policy and non-free content policy? (Adherence to these is needed for Good Article or Featured Article consideration, and is apparently a common reason for nominations being quick-failed.) One image; no sound clips. ===References, sources and bibliography=== Does the article contain a suitable number of references? Does it contain sufficient inline citations? (For an article to pass Good Article nomination, every paragraph possibly excepting those in the lead, and every direct quotation, should have at least one footnote.) If appropriate, does it include Further Reading or Bibliography beyond the cited references? Article has references; no inline citations. ===Structure and compliance with WP:MOS=== Does the article comply with Wikipedia style and layout guidelines, especially WP:MOS, WP:LEAD, WP:LAYOUT, and possibly WP:SIZE? (Article length is not generally significant, although Featured Articles Candidates may be questioned for excessive length.) ok ===Things that may be necessary to pass a Good Article review=== Article requires more inline citations (WP:CITE) ===Summary=== This is a decent article. While it does leave a tantalizing gap at the end of the bio, his life and works seem to be well-covered. The article could use a works list (although his major works appear to all be mentioned), some sound, and inline citations. Magic♪piano 15:00, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Last edited at 15:00, 11 February 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 14:26, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Image removed

I have removed File:G. M. Milizio, Cappella de' Cavalieri a Santa Maria in Aracoeli1.jpg from the head of the article. It was misidentified as a bust of Emilio de' Cavalieri. It is actually the bust of Giovanni Battista Milizio de Cavalieri on his tomb in the Cappella de' Cavalieri in the Santa Maria in Aracoeli church in Rome. This is quite clear not only from the file information, but also from the complete image of the tomb and its inscription at File:Cappella de' Cavalieri a Santa Maria in Aracoeli.jpg and File:Santa Maria in Aracoeli Grabmal G B Milizio.JPG. This mis-identification had been propagated all over the internet thanks to Wikipedia. Voceditenore (talk) 10:12, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Emilio de' Cavalieri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040822080055/http://sscm-jscm.press.uiuc.edu/jscm/v9/no1/Morelli.html to http://sscm-jscm.press.uiuc.edu/jscm/v9/no1/Morelli.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:13, 20 September 2017 (UTC)