Talk:Emblem of Turkmenistan

Emblem of Turkmenistan is within the scope of the Heraldry and vexillology WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of heraldry and vexillology. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Heraldry and vexillologyWikipedia:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyTemplate:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyheraldry and vexillology articles

Central Asia Low‑importance

	Asia portal Emblem of Turkmenistan is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Tibet, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang and Central Asian portions of Iran, Pakistan and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.Central AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Central AsiaCentral Asia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

arms shapes and cite tag[edit]

Ehm, why is this coat different than the one on the Turkmenistan article? -- Obradović Goran (ta^lk 21:45, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am removing the cite tag-the round version was the one on the national article prior to 2006, no cite needed as was in Wikipedia itself, both are in use. Chris 05:45, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

From 1991 until 2003, the round arms was used. But I have not seen the round arms used at all, except on us (and maybe a few college websites). User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 06:00, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I also thinking that the round arms have different colors than what we have now, so I am going to remove this again. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 06:04, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Now, I am going to find the Turkmen Law from 1992 and see if that sheds any light on the colors. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 06:47, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cool! And brother, your diligence on this, your great graphics and your sturdy, polished post-Soviet articles are most appreciated, if I've not said so before. Chris 06:53, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Graphic completed, uploading now. I looked at some of the Turkmen stamps from 2001 and found the correct image. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 07:15, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Emblem of Turkmenistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20011117012823/http://www.turkmenistanembassy.org/turkmen/history/emblem.html to http://www.turkmenistanembassy.org/turkmen/history/emblem.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:30, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Needs elaboration on the cotton[edit]

The word "cotton" occurs only once in the article, where it has the pattern of discussing something already introduced elsewhere. But it isn't. So we don't know anything about it, and, especially, we don't know why the number of ?"bolls"? is seven.2600:1700:6759:B000:1C64:8308:33BC:E2D6 (talk) 03:38, 17 October 2023 (UTC)Christopher Lawrence Simpson[reply]