Talk:Elmira, California

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This just ain't right...

...and the median income for a family is $100,000. Males have a median income of $41,406 versus $0 for females. The per capita income for the CDP is $35,397. 7.0% of the population and 0.0% of families are below the poverty line. Out of the total population, 0.0% of those under the age of 18 and 100.0% of those 65 and older are living below the poverty line.

--tgeller 03:47, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article was created with that info. I'll double check it next time I'm researching stuff, I was just about to get off wikipedia for the night. I agree that it doesn't sound right. Killiondude (talk) 08:23, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Updated this section. The data was accurately reported from the 2000 census data, but the economic demographics were based on a small sample size, so didn't accurately reflect the town. I updated the paragraph to reflect this.Bonnie (talk) 02:24, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elmira, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:15, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elmira, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:31, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Archived link was correct, but I switched the source to reference the new, working URL for the same data. Bonnie (talk) 02:24, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]