Talk:Elizabeth Cary, Viscountess Falkland

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Poetry Mid‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Theatre Top‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History High‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Red: Alphabet run: C & D (2022)

This article was created or improved during the Alphabet run: C & D edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Red project in August 2022. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles

Expansion[edit]

My professor for English literature has given us an assignment to update/work on/expand a wikipedia page of someone important to English literature. My group and I will be adding and editing the information on this page over the next few days in order to complete this project. If you have any questions please feel free to get in touch with me or my professor RedCKnight. Gcourt18 (talk) 23:32, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Please put the citations within <ref> </ref> tags and move them up to the paragraphs that they support. See User talk:Redcknight for more advice. – Fayenatic London 12:49, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Two Elizabeth Carys[edit]

I made an error in taking Elizabeth Tanfield for Elizabeth Trevannion and Henry for Robert Carey. The entry for Elizabeth Trevannion has the royal guardianship and its date-- Feb 23, 1604. Please permit the removal of my original mistake.Church of the Rain (talk) 16:20, 3 August 2021 (UTC) Church of the Rain (talk) 16:27, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation of edits[edit]

I removed a sentence without sources that needed further explanation: it sounded interesting, but it also sounded like someone's interpretation. Perhaps if it were referenced it could go back. Also removed another sentence that appears, to me at least, to lack neutrality. They are indicated in the edit summary. Happy to discuss either of these edits (or any others) here. — scribbling woman 02:39, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]