Talk:Eleutherococcus senticosus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

This article needs some clean-up... It is just cheerleading siberian ginseng and supposed health benefits. One link doesn't work, the other does not make all these claims. Even so, it needs to be toned down a bit, IMHO. Kristan 17:05, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There are some harmful interactions with this herb that need to be mentioned.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.97.137.182 (talkcontribs)
I've added a couple of points. I endorse Kristan's comment.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Nunquam Dormio (talkcontribs)

There is substantial research on the constituents and actions of Eleutherococcus. Most of them are Russian or Korean. There is also substantial information on the medicinally active constituents. I will be adding more information in the future. Ksvaughan2 03:26, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that most (all?) of them are Soviet or Korean (North?) should send you a message... Charles35 (talk) 02:45, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
What message might that be? Both countries are well-known for conducting research on oriental herbs. Did you mean that as the message? David Spector (talk) 00:28, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Acanthopanacis[edit]

I'm not a botanist but I have seen some references that state that Acanthopanacis and Eleutherococcus are the same plant. Can anybody verify this? And, if so, it might be a relevant piece of information to integrated in this description. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.169.188.225 (talk) 17:15, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, neither am I, but I did what you suggested. I just went to the USDA GRIN page, checked out what they had and added the information to the taxobox (green box on the right), including the reference. We should probably add a REDIRECT for these two synonyms to redirect them to this article, so if someone searches under the other names, they will be redirected to this article.
WriterHound (talk) 18:34, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


- Just stumbled upon this article. Need to know: Which part of the plant is prepared for medicinal use? Leaves? Stems? Fruit? Flowers? Roots? Are any of these NOT to be consumed? Thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.129.55.120 (talk) 22:45, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply] 

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 11:35, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

pronunciation[edit]

What is the correct way/s to pronounce "eleuthero"? And, could someone add the standard pronunciation key to the WP entry? thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.84.179.81 (talk) 04:08, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Part of plant[edit]

Which part(s) of the plant are consumed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.110.205.140 (talk) 01:46, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits from IP concerning marijuana[edit]

Dear IP 71.209.163.197,

I see you have added a claim about this herb and its effect on marijuana withdrawal at least 3-4 times over the past 6 weeks. It has been removed each time. I see that you recently added a citation needed tag to it, so you must be aware of the original research policy. The problem is that it isn't okay to add anything in the world as long as you include a citation needed tag. I encourage you to find a source for the claim, and then add your material.

See here for the last time this material was added: [1]

I am going to remove it right now, again. Please do not add it another time without providing a reliable source. If you'd like to discuss the issue here, please do. I will answer any questions you have. Charles35 (talk) 03:15, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

IP, this is your last warning. If you continue to revert my edits, you will undoubtedly be edit warring. Please see here. Charles35 (talk) 05:44, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Since the above was written in response to edit warring from IP 71.209.163.197 (Scottsdale, Arizona), other IP addresses that geolocate to Arizona have repeatedly added the same material without citation. For ease of reference, they are: 63.225.203.26, 71.38.119.178, 71.209.174.153, 71.209.185.179, 174.17.19.138, 174.17.23.199, 174.17.177.10, 174.19.214.140 (Phoenix, Arizona), 97.124.106.105, 209.180.137.121 (Peoria, Arizona), 184.101.2.199 (Mesa, Arizona), 174.17.166.173 (Glendale, Arizona). Sminthopsis84 (talk) 21:28, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I like this article about eleuthero [Siberian Ginseng][edit]

https://www.mountainroseherbs.com/products/eleuthero-root/profile

I think some of the info there should be in this article.

Namely this bit: "eleuthero has been used extensively in traditional Chinese medicine for millennia, yet was barely noticed by the rest of the world until Russian researchers began studying it in the 1960's.2 In fact the term 'adaptogen' came from Soviet scientist, N.V. Lazarev, who, in 1947 coined this term when describing eleuthero's actions."

73.143.84.242 (talk) 22:39, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eleutherococcus senticosus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:26, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]