Talk:Elegy (The X-Files)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleElegy (The X-Files) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starElegy (The X-Files) is part of the The X-Files (season 4) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 12, 2013Good article nomineeListed
July 14, 2013Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Elegy (The X-Files)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ruby2010 (talk · contribs) 03:30, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can't resist an episode that aired on my birthday! Will review it soon. Ruby 2010/2013 03:30, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

  • Lead's first para could use a copy-edit (too many sentences begin with "the episode..."
  • "the performance of Anderson was especially praised." -- you mention Anderson before explaining who she is
  • "...along with the words "She is me.". " -- double period
  • You say the episode is "unconnected to the series' wider mythology" but then mention Scully's cancer. I haven't seen the series, but what I've picked up on, isn't her cancer part of the mythology? Or am I mistaken?
  • "...but many were reluctant..." - I would re-write to "...but many establishments were reluctant..."
  • Where is the Thunderbird Bowling Center located?
  • What is a pinspotter carriage? Is there a good wikilink for this?
  • "then-unmarried wife" - you mean future wife?
  • "The series was allowed to filming in the location..." typo
  • Italicize the Shearman and Pearson book
  • "greater attention to the relationship... -- where does the quote end?
  • "...lauded Anerson's performance..."
  • in a manner that was "offensive at works and just plain idiotic at best". -- is that supposed to be "worst"?
  • The image could be enlarged

Otherwise, looks good. Placing on hold for seven days. Ruby 2010/2013 21:15, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I've gotten everything. Thanks for reviewing!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 22:51, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good. Passing for GA. Ruby 2010/2013 17:49, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]