Talk:Electronic tagging

Untitled

could you talk some thing about the adv and disad of the Electronic tagging System. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.18.254.171 (talk • contribs)

-=-=reply baby=-=-

okay bro so advs:

 obv criminals wont be able to run away
 if you is doing sumthing bad they know where you at

disads:

 if you wanna run away you cant
 its a privacy issue acording to some
 also it costs money to do anything these days

Peace out, ~Tryptonite —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.154.28.171 (talk) 17:06, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Electronic tagging

Why do employers want to TRACK you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.5.67.194 (talk) 14:17, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Electronic fence

By gps trackers (terminals)you can set the present point as the center of the circular fence; with this point as the center of the circle and the distance as the radius, the circle thus formed is a circular fence. With the goal that when the tracker (child, dog, car...) leaves the circle an alarm goes off. Generally, the electronic fence for the terminal is off by default; user can send SMS to the terminal to turn on the electronic fence. An alternative is 'geofence'. This is a geometric figure defined (drag) by the two opposite corners for exemple on an existing (google) map or by typing the coordinates of the two cornerpoints. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.134.148.82 (talk) 13:50, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Electronic tagging. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140820114756/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/10228874/GPS-jammer-costs-driver-32000-after-interfering-with-plane-signals.html to http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/10228874/GPS-jammer-costs-driver-32000-after-interfering-with-plane-signals.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:23, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Electronic tagging. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071012153155/http://freewebs.com/qitranscripts/408.htm to http://www.freewebs.com/qitranscripts/408.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:28, 19 September 2017 (UTC)