Talk:Edge Hill, Warwickshire

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Warwickshire, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Warwickshire. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.WarwickshireWikipedia:WikiProject WarwickshireTemplate:WikiProject WarwickshireWikiProject Warwickshire articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.

Wikipedians in Warwickshire may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

I, in earnest, would like a panoramic of the most feasible place for Charles I to place his art/archers. :-}

Parliamentarian Army links[edit]

The Roundhead link gives no relevant information. The Parliament of England link is not perfect but it does give an idea of what that party represented: its thinking and its background.

Wrong name/place[edit]

According to the Ordnance Survey gazateer, Edge Hill, Warwickshire is just south of Tamworth at the other end of the county to the place being described here; and the coordinates and topography listed here seem to relate to the place it calls Edgehill, Warwickshire.

Do we have any other sources to counter this, or should we think of moving this article (with explanatory text, of course)?. -- Chris j wood 16:22, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Bartholomew Gazetteer of Britain. 1st edn. (1977) ISBN 0-85152-771X has the Edge Hill near Radway as two words. There is another one in Merseyside but that too is a two-word name.

The Tamworth one is not listed in that book. It does appear (as two words) on the OS 1" 7th Series sheet 131 (1953), at grid ref SP240986. (RJP 21:56, 25 August 2006 (UTC))[reply]

My OS 1:50,000 sheet 151, 2001 revision, uses two words for the hill and one word for the hamlet. The hill is bigger than the hamlet, and for most people it and its history are of far greater importance. May I please suggest that we leave the title of this article as two words? Motacilla (talk) 18:38, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that Edge Hill Tower is actually in Radway Civic Parish..This is the reason that Radway does not have a Public House, has 1 already exsists in the Parish — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.237.213.46 (talk) 09:37, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agree that the hamlet is a single word, as shown by Google streetview. Fixed in the article. Both variants are used liberally in sources confusing the issue. Widefox; talk 01:43, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ghosts - dubious[edit]

Accepting that some people believe this stuff, it still needs a credible citation. Otherwise it is just someone making it up for a laugh. Good lcuk with the credible citation! --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 17:18, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you actually looked at the end of the article, I cited a reference. (82.28.237.200 (talk) 23:01, 30 August 2008 (UTC))[reply]

I reverted your change before reading this comment. I still think that there needs to be clarification in the section as the reference does not answer the who query. Also probably adding the reference to the previous paragraph may also help as the one who tagged it had problems with that text. Keith D (talk) 23:43, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Edge Hill, Warwickshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110613154410/http://ads.ahds.ac.uk/catalogue/archive/stones_ahrb_2005/cfm/Public/details/QuarryDetails.cfm?QuarryCode=EDGE to http://ads.ahds.ac.uk/catalogue/archive/stones_ahrb_2005/cfm/Public/details/QuarryDetails.cfm?QuarryCode=EDGE

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:14, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]