Talk:Ebralinag v. Division Superintendent

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 14 November 2023 by reviewer Timtrent (talk · contribs).

Tambayan Philippines Low‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Christianity: Witnesses Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Jehovah's Witnesses.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copyright[edit]

@Timtrent: seems we might have a copyright issue as the licence is on the list of those not accepted. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:14, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Curb Safe Charmer The only material I saw that was copied directly was the case name and other technical material that cannot be phrased differently. This included the banner copyvios report. Have I missed something? 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:16, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

92.7% similar, but on reflecton most of it couldn't be phrased differently. No worries then. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:22, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Curb Safe Charmer That agrees with my thinking. Glad we are on the same page 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:23, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Curb Safe Charmer A further thought. If you follow the Supreme Court logo to Commons c:Template:PD-PhilippinesGov is applied 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:22, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Timtrent: Good spot! Added it. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:27, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]