Talk:Eastbourne

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Eastbourne article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Eastbourne has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 1, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
April 25, 2008	Peer review	Reviewed
July 19, 2011	Good article reassessment	Kept

Current status: Good article

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

England Mid‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sussex Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge proposal: Eastbourne Local History Society to here[edit]

Mikeo1938 created the article and Randykitty tagged it for WP:NOTABILITY. I can't see that the society meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG, but they would be worth a mention in the History section of this article. Boleyn (talk) 17:41, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps either mention in the History section or in a Societies section? For some other examples see Currie#Local History Society; Barningham, County Durham; Bolton, East Riding of Yorkshire; and Morgannwg (journal). However, Mundaring and Hills Historical Society merits an article on its own as do Queensland Family History Society; Pembrokeshire Historian; and Galway Archaeological and Historical Society. I don't see much consistency in approach. Headhitter (talk) 18:26, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Both merge targets sound like good options. Each historical society is looked at independently as to whether it meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG; I don't know if the ones you mention meet the guidelines or are some of the thousands of articles of doubtful notability on WP. Boleyn (talk) 07:49, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Checked the other articles over; if any of them meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG, it is in no way clear from their articles. All look to be non-notable, but I've tagged them for further examination. Boleyn (talk) 07:52, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unless the Eastbourne Local History Society is itself particularly notable then it should be merged with the Eastbourne article. Anyone looking for a local history society in Eastbourne is more likely to find it there anyway. Headhitter (talk) 12:23, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merged no objections to merge during the two weeks this discussion was open. Thanks, Headhitter, for your help. Boleyn (talk) 12:29, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Eastbourne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.eastbourne.gov.uk/leisure/theatres
Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071007100849/http://www.muchmusic.com/music/artists/bio.asp?artist=362 to http://www.muchmusic.com/music/artists/bio.asp?artist=362

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:36, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Eastbourne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110928031418/http://www.eastbourne.gov.uk/eastbourne/news/2009/april-2009/towner-opening-an-important-milestone/?locale=en to http://www.eastbourne.gov.uk/eastbourne/news/2009/april-2009/towner-opening-an-important-milestone/?locale=en

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:28, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eastbourne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/66Jce6VxM?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.metoffice.gov.uk%2Fclimate%2Fuk%2Fextremes%2F to http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/extremes/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:59, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

healthcare[edit]

there is a healthcare center called the lighthouse in town near the station 2A02:C7E:38D9:6A00:BD0C:CE62:5289:185D (talk) 10:11, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]