Talk:East Hagbourne

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

i think that the redirect should be removed. i think that if they fail to type in Hagbourne with a capital "H", then Wikipedia will surely give them a list of articles that it could be.--Halowithhorns89 18:20, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: the smallest window in England. The George Inn in Kingston-upon-Hull claims to be the owner of the smallest window. Judging by photos of the window in Hull it would certainly seem to be even smaller than the small window in East Hagbourne. According to the East Hagbourne Village website and my own observations, the "smallest window in East Hagbourne" is not much more than 3 inches x 3 inches. There can hardly be an argument against the idea that the East Hagbourne window is "one of the smallest". Maybe the Guinness Book of Records needs to visit with a tape measure! Sionk (talk) 21:46, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Location[edit]

I was in east Eastbourne and used the nearby button and apparently it's 250 metres away?

WikipediaUserCalledChris (talk) 14:47, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on East Hagbourne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:15, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]