Talk:East Greenwich, Rhode Island

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

East Greenwich is a very nice town, filled with very nice people. They are mostly rich, but not in a snobby way.East Greenwich is beautiful, but you have to have money to live in the town. There are half of rich people, and half of middle class. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.229.66.25 (talk) 21:43, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Emperor!?[edit]

I don't see anything on the town website saying anything about this. No one else noticed? I'm going to fix it soon if no one shows me the "Emperor" of East Greenwich. Atrivedi (talk) 23:45, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on East Greenwich, Rhode Island. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:15, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]