Talk:Earl of Wemyss

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

de jure (I do not think that word means what this article seems to think it means)[edit]

If the law says that a title is forfeit and cannot be inherited, the heir to that forfeited title cannot possibly be the de jure earl, can he? Because it is precisely de jure that he is not the heir. I think the word we're looking for is "self-styled," but then the whole numbering of everything in this article is kind of screwed up. john k (talk) 21:34, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 18 August 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Mdewman6 (talk) 22:37, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Earl of Wemyss and MarchEarl of Wemyss – Peerages of equal rank with individual histories usually have separate articles even if they are currently held by the same person, e.g. Earl of Lindsey and Earl of Abingdon or Duke of Richmond, Duke of Gordon, and Duke of Lennox. The convention in these cases is generally for each page title to refer to a single peerage, with links to the pages about the other peerages. In this case the page title should be 'Earl of Wemyss', including the history of the earldom of March after 1823 and a link to Earl of March for the previous history of the title A.D.Hope (talk) 18:05, 18 August 2021 (UTC) — Relisting. Bada Kaji (talk • श्रीमान् गम्भीर) 18:50, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.