Talk:Dyson's transform

This page was proposed for deletion by Arthur Rubin (talk · contribs) on 13 March 2009 with the comment:
Accurate, but gives neither a real source, nor evidence of notability.
It was contested by Uncia (talk · contribs) on 2009-03-13 with the comment:
article improved to address nominator's concerns

Please write understandable[edit]

The modern life give us very little possibilities to use precious time to interpret. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4643:E6E3:0:B99A:4E6A:45C0:A343 (talk) 22:10, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dyson's transform[edit]

This article never gets around to saying what "Dyson's transform" is. It's also badly written in several other respects:

It may be confusing the singleton of a set with the set itself;
It has no proper initial context-setting;
Some notation style issues.

Michael Hardy (talk) 16:38, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]