Talk:Dragon C106

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 29 June 2017 by reviewer Drewmutt (talk · contribs).

Spaceflight Mid‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The Daily Mail[edit]

Unfortunately, Wikipedia policy currently does not support use of the daily mail as a source. Please replace that.

(I don't write, or necessarily agree with the decisions. My opinion is irrelevant in Wikipedia. I just follow them) (for more information, see WP:DAILYMAIL)

Eddie891 (talk) 23:16, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This may ultimately lead to Dragon V1 capsules being reused as much as 3 times.
Parachutes replaced
Many inspections and X-ray examinations followed to recertify the capsule for flight to NASA standards.

^[1]

I have removed the passages supported solely by The Daily Mail sourced information. -- 65.94.169.56 (talk) 06:50, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Mark Prigg (1 June 2017). "First a recycled rocket, now a second hand spacecraft: SpaceX attempt to launch Dragon capsule for the SECOND time delayed due to weather". The Daily Mail (London).

Article[edit]

@JFG: What do you think about this? Since you created the latest B1029 article, how about this subject? -- 65.94.42.131 (talk) 05:12, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Third flight[edit]

Will there be a third flight of this capsule? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.61.176.165 (talk) 06:48, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[DailyMail-2017-06-01-1] Mark Prigg (1 June 2017). "First a recycled rocket, now a second hand spacecraft: SpaceX attempt to launch Dragon capsule for the SECOND time delayed due to weather". The Daily Mail (London).

[1]