This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
This article was created or improved during the Women's rights initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2021. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
Hi SusunW - I've made a few changes that seemed obvious, but have a few comments/questions which I'd like your thoughts on before making a change.
The last sentence of the lead doesn't quite make sense to me - I can't make out what the subject of the main clause is. Should it read 'Though it is not synonymous with citizenship, for rights granted under domestic law for domestic purposes, the United Kingdom, and thus the commonwealth, hashave traditionally used the words interchangeably.'? (This is assuming that 'the United Kingdom and the commonwealth' are the subjects, so I've pluralised 'have').
Yes, that's good.
In the bullet point 'By affiliation' list, both of the last bullet points end in full stops (periods). Should the penultimate one not have a semi-colon (and possibly an 'or' after it) instead?
Yes, it should have been as you say.
I'm not a great fan of this sentence: Denaturalisation may occur if a person obtained nationality through fraud, false representation, or concealment; acts of treason; disloyalty or service to a foreign government; certain criminal offences; loss of nationality of a spouse or parent; and in the case of nationality by investment for failure to meet requirements of the program. I feel that each snippet between the semi-colons ought to have a verb, since the verb prior to the semi-colons (obtained) doesn't seem to apply to these other bits. I'd probably have written it something like 'Denaturalisation may occur if a person obtained nationality through fraud, false representation, or concealment; if they have committed acts of treason; if they have committed acts of disloyalty or service to a foreign government; if they are found guilty of certain criminal offences; if their spouse or parent loses their nationality; and in the case of nationality by investment for failure to meet requirements of the program.' It might be possible to fix this more elegantly by changing the beginning of the sentence though.
Works for me.
when England acquired the island - I haven't checked the sources, but this is post-union - wouldn't it have been the United Kingdom that acquired the island? (Chippy Scot speaking here! :P)
I'm happy to do that.
That's all from me - I'll take a look at the other one later on. Great article by the way, and very important - you put me feel quite self-indulgent in writing about obscure buildings that happen to interest me when there are subjects like this wanting articles! GirthSummit (blether) 10:47, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much Girth Summit. These will be similar corrections in the next one (as well as all of the British origin ones), so just do it if you would. I'm sort of working through them by colonizer because it makes it easier to 1) not have to flip between multiple languages (except that I still must in the Caribbean, LOL) and 2) understand the overall scheme. In the event that the topic isn't clear, I am working on a piece on women's nationality, but it is impossible (for me) to write without understanding the context of the history behind it. Most people do not know that women had no individual nationality, some still don't, until the 20th century, so it seemed important to me that it not be tucked away in a separate article, but instead visible within the individual articles dealing with the topic. I really appreciate your help. I think I am now at 26 done and only 167 to go before I have the background finished and can write the main article. o.O SusunW (talk) 14:40, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
