Talk:Doctor–patient relationship

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tacunank329.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 15 January 2019 and 9 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Shannonballard.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 August 2020 and 18 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Peramunedj.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): MarkOG.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:39, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 03:56, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

---

Any room to talk about the lessening personality of the doctor-patient relationship? With every step forward in technology, a doctor relies less on what a patient is saying and more on what his/her instruments are saying. A person becomes not a patient but merely another body to be worked on. Highly opinionated the way I word it, but thats why I'm posting it here. --24.18.62.22 (talk) 19:32, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

---

Dash format

I believe that the phrase should use an endash. The article's title uses an emdash while the opening sentence uses a hyphen. Axl ¤ [Talk] 08:36, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: recent move reverted. If the editor who moved it wants to object, he/she should lodge a proper move request. Rennell435 (talk) 10:14, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

---

Doctor—patient relationship → Doctor-patient relationship – This page was moved from Doctor-patient relationship to Doctor—patient relationship, without discussion, against all accepted standards of punctuation (en dash [–] would be right, not em dash[—]), and apparently in ignorance of the ArbCom injunction currently in force that prohibits exchanges of hyphen and en dash in moves (though this is doubly wrong, because of the em dash). The move was executed in this edit. I ask that the original title be restored immediately. (I would request, once the ArbCom injunction is lifted, that the article be moved to Doctor–patient relationship, in accord with WP:MOS and common practice.) Noetica^Tea? 09:22, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

"Perspectives" section

I moved most of the Perspectives section to here, because the content needs a cleanup before reinsertion. First, it needs to be fitted into other sections, or into new, more specific sections, because "Perspectives of..." makes it basically a trivia section. I moved some information that I understood as an issue of continuity of care to its proper section under Issues, but the rest still needs to be organized in a more encyclopaedic way. Mikael Häggström (talk) 11:07, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Perspectives The physician-patient relationship can be analyzed from the perspective of ethical concerns, in terms of how well the goals of non-maleficence, beneficence, autonomy, and justice are achieved. Many other values and ethical issues can be added to these. In different societies, periods, and cultures, different values may be assigned different priorities. For example, in the last 30 years medical care in the Western World has increasingly emphasized patient autonomy in decision making. The relationship and process can also be analyzed in terms of social power relationships (e.g., by Michel Foucault), or economic transactions. Physicians have been accorded gradually higher status and respect over the last century, and they have been entrusted with control of access to prescription medicines as a public health measure. This represents a concentration of power and carries both advantages and disadvantages to particular kinds of patients with particular kinds of conditions. A further twist has occurred in the last 25 years as costs of medical care have risen, and a third party (an insurance company or government agency) now often insists upon a share of decision-making power for a variety of reasons, reducing freedom of choice for healthcare providers and patients in many ways. In some settings, e.g. the hospital ward, the patient-physician relationship is much more complex, and many other people are involved when somebody is ill: relatives, neighbors, rescue specialists, nurses, technical personnel, social workers and others. Other Perspectives In non-Western societies, particularly traditional Eastern societies and American Indian societies, the physician/patient relationship may be couched in different terms. The illness may be seen as a violation of the spiritual realm and the cure will be seen likewise as having to take place in the spiritual realm. Violation of some spiritual rule can result in illness; persons distant to the patient may have caused illness by manoeuvres in the spiritual realm, by cursing or causing another practitioner / shaman / healer to place the curse. Powerful faith in these factors can result in serious illness or cure. Spirits can be part of a culture's usual pantheon, ancestor spirits or arbitrary new spirit forces arising independently or as derived from an existing object in the real world: such as an animist spirit coming from a totem animal, mountain or other thing. As in the scientific West, the practitioner is assumed to have special knowledge or power, and is paid by the patient in some form.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Doctor–patient relationship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131414591600/http://www.gmc-uk.org/news/21839.asp to http://www.gmc-uk.org/news/21839.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090323192232/http://www.patient-physician.com/docs/PatientPhysician.pdf to http://www.patient-physician.com/docs/PatientPhysician.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:36, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Consider Revision

Consider looking at the spelling errors that are currently present within this article. There are instances of misspellings that could easily make this article appear more reliable. Also consider looking at the word choice in most of the sections as there may be a better way to describe or "get to the point" quicker with less unnecessary words. Miranda.Baranchak (talk) 01:20, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Source 2

Reference Two now comes up with a 404 error.Dead link!MarkOG (talk) 15:05, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Efficacy section

When speaking of efficacy, part of the study cited was copy pasted so that was put in quotes and cited. Additionally, I clarified the conclusion of that study so as to not give anyone misleading info.MarkOG (talk) 15:07, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Paragraph 2

Re-worded some of paragraph 2. Previous wording was harder to read. Needed a period or to be broken up.MarkOG (talk) 15:09, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

link

added link to placeboMarkOG (talk) 15:15, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

some minor fixes

added some links to other wiki pages, made some spelling correctionsMarkOG (talk) 15:32, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

physician superiority

combined sentences that were left in a gap and elaborated a little MarkOG (talk) 15:39, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

changed section

changed title of one section instead just having "other people involved"

also added new dimension to previous changeMarkOG (talk) 15:48, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

patient

added more to this previous one-sentence section. MarkOG (talk) 16:03, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Move the patient behavior section under aspects of relationship

IT seems as if "patient behavior" should be bumped up as a subheading under aspects or relationship. Could not figure out how to make this change without causing issue with cited sources. MarkOG (talk) 18:41, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Doctor–patient relationship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304042333/http://www.balintinternational.com/downloads/Balint_in_a_Nutshell.pdf to http://www.balintinternational.com/downloads/Balint_in_a_Nutshell.pdf
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.gmc-uk.org/news/21839.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:19, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Proposed modifications: new sections, changes to existing sections

I intend to add 2 new subsections for Medical mistrust and Physician communication style under "Aspects of relationship" - I also plan to add sources to the flagged Physician superiority section and make some revisions to sections including the Introduction and Physician bias. I plan to add more Wikipedia links within the article as well.

NEUwikiLL (talk) 20:23, 14 April 2021 (UTC)