Talk:Do It Again (EP)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Album?[edit]

Should this not be classified as an EP? - eo (talk) 17:10, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support; it's only five tracks and thirty minutes long, so I completely agree that this should be recognized as an extended play. I'd like to get a wider consensus on the matter before any changes are made though, so I'll add an RfC tag to see where the rest of the community stands on this. WikiRedactor (talk) 20:25, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support based on the track count and duration. WikiRedactor summed it up quite well. Snuggums (talk • contributions) 20:30, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support as per WikiRedactor. The term "mini-album" should really be removed, it's ambiguous and confusing, considering that its Wikipedia article says it's a mini vinyl record. — prism △ 21:32, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Although I'd normally agree that a five-track release should be classified as an extended play, most sources refer to it as a mini-album. Röyksopp themselves explained why they call it a mini-album rather than an EP. SN▲P • SN▲P 03:58, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's still not the correct technical term and as I've said, mini-album is confusing to readers. If anything classify Do It Again as an EP and write in the Background section or something that they call it a "mini-album", without linking. — prism △ 10:19, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • @SnapSnap: If I could point out that section in The Daily Beast article, Robyn is quoted with saying "I call it an EP!" and Svein Berge is quoted with saying "You call it an EP. I call it mini-album. I think it has to do with the fact that 'EP' sounds like a selection of tracks, whereas 'mini-album' sounds like a cohesive whole." It would seem like their only distinction between the two terms is a perceived sense of unity, which is a matter of opinion and does not change the technical distinctions that separate a studio album from an extended play. WikiRedactor (talk) 17:59, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support This one is a typical example of a EP and I believe such a case is with Gaga's The Fame and The Fame Monster, and even though Gaga called the later as album, it is still listed as EP since Billboard classifies it as such. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 04:01, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment; since there seems to be a consensus towards treating the project as an EP, would everyone be alright with me moving the article to "Do It Again (EP)" and making the necessary changes in the article itself? WikiRedactor (talk) 23:03, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Since this discussion has been open for one week and no additional opinions have been added since June 28, I will go ahead and make these adjustments in the article. WikiRedactor (talk) 15:31, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Do It Again (EP). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:25, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Do It Again (EP). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:16, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Do_It_Again_(EP)&oldid=1206991769"