Talk:Divine Intervention (2002 film)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Film: French

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the French cinema task force.

Palestine Low‑importance

	Palestine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tariq Shadid[edit]

Who is Tariq Shadid, and why is his opinion noteworthy? Jayjg ^(talk) 19:17, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

He's an MD with an opinion, according to Xed. Since he's not a reputable film critic, I removed his opinion from the article, but Xed reverted...four times in fact. --Viriditas | Talk 11:48, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Xed's revert war[edit]

Four reverts in less than 24 hours:

11:31, 4 November 2005 Xed m [1]
10:37, 4 November 2005 [2]
09:10, 4 November 2005 Xed m (rv weasel) [3]
18:32, 3 November 2005 Xed m (rv bizarre censorship) [4]

Xed has also added citations that do not support claims in the article, particularly:

"After a vigorous campaign by Zionist activists to bar the movie" [5]

This non-neutral cite does not appear to make this specific claim.

"based on a spontaneously declared informal policy" [6]

The cite does not make this specific claim.

In the above two examples, Xed simply cited his opinion, not the alleged citations. When I politely pointed this out to Xed in the edit summary, he reverted and responded with: you've been caught lying. you can't review all those pages in 3 minutes!. He's partly right; it only took me one minute--not three--to discover that Xed had fabricated content in at least two specific instances as demonstrated above. Due to this behavior, I've added the totally disputed tag. --Viriditas | Talk 12:01, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Weasel tag-team in effect - Xed 12:05, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

citations[edit]

Can we find a citation for "spokesperson John Pavlik stated that the Academy had never made a decision on that issue because Suleiman had never submitted his film"? If there's any kind of formal submission process, it should be clear-cut as to whether or not the film was submitted. -- Danny Yee 23:35, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It's already cited in the article. [7]. Another POV of the submission is offered here which is also cited. --Viriditas | Talk 01:04, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

-- According to same article, article was not submitted because the Executive Director of AMPAS said it was not eligible for submission based on the fact that the UN doe not recognize Palestine as a country. (--preceeding unsigned comment by 209.212.72.19)

Fair use rationale for Image:Divine Intervention film.jpg[edit]

Image:Divine Intervention film.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Electronic Intifada[edit]

Although its claims are more than plausible in this case, electronic intifada is not a reliable source.--Rataube (talk) 06:20, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to stress that Mr. Elias Suleiman is a Christian Israeli Arab born in Nazareth. The film is in Hebrew as well as in Arabic. I wonder how could this film have been excluded from the Academy Awards on the basis that it was a Palestinian film. In fact Divine Intervention is an Israeli film by an Israeli Arab director. 2.40.179.78 (talk) 19:47, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Divine Intervention (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070313092448/http://www.villagevoice.com:80/film/0304,fahim2,41328,20.html to http://www.villagevoice.com/film/0304,fahim2,41328,20.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:12, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Divine Intervention (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:21, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Divine Intervention (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050226024700/http://www.miftah.org/Display.cfm?DocId=2295&CategoryId=24 to http://www.miftah.org/Display.cfm?DocId=2295&CategoryId=24

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:52, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]