Talk:District line

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:District line simple RDT.

Trains: Rapid transit / in UK / in London Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
Sel	week 20, 2014

	London Transport Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject London Transport (assessed as High-importance).

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

District line extension to Battersea and onto Waterloo???[edit]

This is going back about 15 years, but I seem to recall getting a leaflet in my mail slot (I live in Battersea) about extending the District Line from Earls Court to Battersea and onto Waterloo using existing tracks (I think they would have had to have added a spur from Earls Court to the tracks that connect Olympia to Clapham Junction). I can't find anything on it. Does anybody know anything about this? Any links? Are the tracks even the right width? I know there is a train service from Clapham Junction north across the Thames that uses a rarely-used section of track. Thanks in advance to anybody who knows. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.98.149.164 (talk) 09:46, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, I haven't heard of this proposal but its unlikely to happen anyway with the focus being on the northern line extension to Battersea.--2.24.174.19 (talk) 14:15, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If they had done this, it would have been a relatively simple matter to put in a connection at the south end of West Brompton station. Other than that, the only necessary track changes would be to install a fourth (centre) rail between West Bromton and Waterloo for the LU traction return current, similar to that already in use between Gunnersbury and Richmond. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 16:00, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Victoria line which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:00, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on District line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:57, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Title is spelt wrong[edit]

This thing: File:District_line_flag_box.svg

It says Disctrict! I suggest someone with svg editing tools fix it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.229.175.46 (talk) 01:55, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted the change which was made in Commons a few weeks ago. Thanks for pointing it out. --David Biddulph (talk) 02:13, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on District line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:52, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]