This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Talk:Dinosaur Ridge is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This is a contested technical request (permalink). --- Coffeeandcrumbs 00:00, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I queried the original request: Dinosaur Ridge (Alberta) is a painfully brief stub with no further contributions since it was created two years ago, while Dinosaur Ridge (Gangwon) is another short and also recently created article. I don't think its unreasonable to regard the Colorado formation as the primary topic, especially given its historical significance. Pageviews since the start of August don't indicate much interest in the others, and winding the clock back further to the start of 2017 doesn't paint a different picture. PC78 (talk) 00:13, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Anthony Appleyard: ...created about 8 hours ago, yes. I believe the intention was to move that page to Dinosaur Ridge and disambiguate the Colorado one, which is the move I've contested. PC78 (talk) 07:55, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per PC78. SnowFire (talk) 15:44, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per PC78. Station1 (talk) 19:27, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per PC78. the clear primary topic for the name is Colorado, the other two should simply have a hat note, and the Gangwon quite possibly is better known in by the Chinese name and not the english translation.---Kevmin§ 20:24, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
