Talk:Demand-side economics

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Demand-side economics article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 December 2016. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 3 August 2016 by reviewer SwisterTwister (talk · contribs).

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Not a theory[edit]

Calling this a "macroeconomic theory" is like saying that "what goes up must come down" is a theory of physics. VineFynn (talk) 07:44, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Compare this page with its opposite, Supply-side economics, and you know the "average" Wikipedian's bias. That said, it is a "theory". Because even Einstein's "theory of relativity" is still called the "theory of relativity". jae (talk) 03:22, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]