Talk:Delta Theta Sigma
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Delta Theta Sigma article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article was nominated for deletion on September 28. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Per comments on the AfD discussion page, this article needs more information on the notability of the organization added, or it may be nominated for deletion a second time.
Please review WP:ORG for information on notability for organizations. - CobaltBlueTony 19:08, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Primary vs. secondary sources[edit]
Hello,
I have changed the tags on the article a bit. Source are now cited. But there's still something missing, namely independent sources. You might want to read Wikipedia:Independent sources for details. Currently, you largely cite your organization's own homepage. To establish notability, you should also cite what others write about you. Press coverage, for example, is a good option. Be aware that all these source must be reliable (some people like citing blogs, personal webpages, etc., but these are not considered reliable because anybody can edit them).
Happy editing, --B. Wolterding 16:24, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Co-educational?[edit]
Is Delta Theta Sigma a men's organization, or is it co-ed? The national website is unavailable to check, but I see that it is listed as co-ed in the article Professional fraternities and sororities. Jax MN (talk) 20:07, 18 February 2021 (UTC)