Talk:Deeping Fen

Deeping Fen has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 27, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

Lincolnshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lincolnshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lincolnshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LincolnshireWikipedia:WikiProject LincolnshireTemplate:WikiProject LincolnshireLincolnshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reversion edit 17 October 2011[edit]

Reverted edit by IP125.33.4.173, summary as "Changed 'people' to 'certain persons' as implication all wanted it contradicted by later mention of unrest and sabotage." Cannot find contradiction to the original text: "The people of Market Deeping, Deeping Gate and Deeping St James, together with other villages...". If what is meant as contradiction is "Unrest in the early 1600s resulted in most of the works being destroyed", this hardly fits the bill. If not it doesn’t really matter either way - the original text is supported by a valid reference. Perhaps an added direct quote from Roberts could clarify this if the text is problematic by being his/her opinion. However the use of the word “purported” in the added edited text is itself blatant editorialised opinion, as just who is it that makes the judgment on whether or not the ‘people’ were represented in entirety, or just 'some people' - IP125.33.4.173 ? I have removed the word “The” from the start of the para so it reads: “People of Market Deeping, Deeping Gate and Deeping St James...” – this leaves it open – it now means some people or all people – I think a reasonable compromise for now. Acabashi (talk) 22:33, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Deeping Fen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://wellandidb.org.uk/index.php
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927045754/http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~alan/family/G-DeepingFen.html to http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~alan/family/G-DeepingFen.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:22, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]