Jump to content

Talk:Decoded (EP)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 08:05, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I will start on this very soon! --K. Peake 08:05, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Peake, Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:40, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead[edit]

  • Are you sure the EP's release date can't be used for "Gratify" in the infobox since it was released for the song?
  • "released by" → "It was released by"
  • "has six songs written by" → "consists of six songs, which were written by" to be more specific
  • "received a generally positive reception." are you sure this is correct since the source cited in the body mentions widespread acclaim? Also, remove the a and add at the end "from music critics".

Composition[edit]

Release and promotion[edit]

Music videos[edit]

Reception[edit]

  • Retitle to Critical reception since that is the only form of reception here
  • "The EP received a generally positive reception" → "Decoded was met with generally positive reviews" or should it be widespread acclaim per my earlier comment?
    •  Done I don't think we should place emphasis on "acclaim" since only one source says so. ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:02, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Target music critics to Music journalism
  • "also called the opening track" → "also called the former" because it is not written out anywhere here that song is the opening track
  • Remove target on Billboard
  • Remove "on the track" since we already know the reviewer is referencing it from the start of the sentence
  • "He said Decoded" → "He said the EP"
  • "and showcases the singer's" → "and showcases the drag queen's" because she is not known as a singer; but maybe change to mentioning it showcases her versality "as a singer" or something similar?
  • Wikilink electronica

Track listing[edit]

  • No source is provided for the writing credits
    • Yeah, another editor removed the sources, which I've added back. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:55, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reception[edit]

External links[edit]

Final comments and verdict[edit]

  •  On hold until the issues are fixed, but I must comment that you do have some good writing skills for sure! --K. Peake 09:55, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Kyle Peake, Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:59, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Another Believer My pleasure to have took on this review for you and also have received such a timely response; I did some copy editing for areas where I did not request changes to be implemented during the review because they did not arise properly until you had made the suggested edits.  Pass now after my contributions to your already strong work! --K. Peake 16:12, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.