Talk:December 2000 nor'easter

December 2000 nor'easter has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 17, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 14, 2010.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that despite snowfall totals exceeding 24 in (60 cm), the effects of the December 2000 nor'easter were minimized due to its weekend arrival?

Weather: Non-tropical Mid‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Non-tropical storms task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:December 2000 nor'easter/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Courcelles (talk) 10:14, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First, I'm sorry this was left for over two months without anyone getting to it. Now that this is open, I'm sure we can work together and get this review done without being overly difficult for either of us. I'll post some comments tonight, but I like to read an article twice, in two different sessions before posting a "full" review.

The images are all PD and tagged as such, but none of the three have {{WP:ALT|alt text]]. Yeah, that's usually an FA thing, but no reason not to take care of it now. No dab links, all links work fine. (Though my computer doesn't want to handle a diju file).

Got it. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:02, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Should the bolded title and the article's title match? Maybe not... I can see both views on this.

Heh, that was a relic from when I moved the article but didn't change the content itself... oops! –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:02, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On the convert templates, is the metre or centimetre more suitable for the metric conversions? Later you switch to millimetres, even, which for 250 mm seems too small a unit.

Think it's better now. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:02, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Although heavy snow fall in the state, no major damage was reported in Connecticut." Something about that sentence seems a touch off; either snow fall needs to be one word, or or the verb needs to be in a different tense.

Ugh, typo. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:02, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"In Massachusetts and Rhode Island, high winds, gusting to as high as to 50 mph" Are there a few extra words in there?

Yeah, fixed. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:02, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll give this another read through tomorrow so my eyes are fresh. Courcelles (talk) 10:31, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review! I really appreciate it. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:02, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. I loveit when I have to nitpick at these, because the article is already in good shape.

So, passed. Courcelles (talk) 15:28, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:08, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Nor'easter which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 06:46, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]