A fact from Deadliest single days of World War I appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 December 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
The French section listed SS Gallia + Cantatrice; I've deleted Cantatrice as .a) it was a separate incident unrelated to the Gallia sinking, and .b) because the source given (Uboat.net's Cantatrice page) has the sinking on a different day.
The Ottoman section listed Barbarossa Hayreddin + Berk-I-Satvet; again I've deleted Berk-i-Satvet as she wasn't sunk then (or at all, in fact). OTOH I've added a footnote about the steamer Gul Djemal; that may possibly have been a bigger disaster than the Barbarossa Hayreddin was. Xyl 54 (talk) 22:48, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
^"Armed liner lost". The Times. No. 40932. London. 13 August 1915. col C, p. 6. template uses deprecated parameter(s) (help)
@Xyl 54: was there two ships with the same name? This one appears to be a gun boat not a cruiser. -- Esemono (talk) 01:06, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Esemono:: No, there was only one ship by that name, though she was classed variously as a torpedo cruiser or as a torpedo gunboat. The Times article quoted only claims Berk-i-Satvet was sunk by “a British submarine”; another article on the same day ("Two submarines in the Dardanelles") describes Berk-i-Satvet as "built by Krupps in 1906" and gives the same information we have here. But the Berk-i-Satvet article is clear, she was mined in the Black Sea in January 1915 and wasn't back in service until April 1918. OTOH her sister ship Peyk-i Şevket was fired on (and missed) by E12 on 22 June, and again (hit and damaged) on 6 August by E11, which may account for the Times story. There is also a Times account of a Peyk-i Şevket class gunboat being hit in May ("Exploits of E14"), which is attributed here and here to AE2, and here to E14, but that just seems to have been optimistic reporting. I hope that helps, Xyl 54 (talk) 23:38, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ottoman Navy