Talk:De Akkers metro station

Trains: Stations / Rapid transit Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Kralingse Zoom which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 01:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of De Akkers metro station crash into De Akkers metro station[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To merge De Akkers metro station crash into De Akkers metro station, while newsworthy at the time, does not have the sustained notability for a page. Klbrain (talk) 23:12, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a newspaper, and this is unlikely to satisfy Wikipedia:Notability (events). Not everything that happens, even quirky events that get reported around the world for 1 day, warrant a permanent encyclopedia article. There is unlikely to be lasting effects or continued coverage. This event can easily be summarized in a few sentences in De Akkers metro station. --Animalparty! (talk) 02:40, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support. per nominator. Thryduulf (talk) 07:59, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. As per given reasons. - X201 (talk) 08:38, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Huge worldwide press coverage. BBC article Extraordinary crash into the whale sculpture. Notable story. The long investigation is coming. 178.95.248.47 (talk) 09:10, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. As per given reasons. Any results from the inquiry can be incorporated into the article on the metro station, as they are intrinsically linked. Autarch (talk) 10:58, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - unusual event, significant coverage means that WP:GNG is met. Mjroots (talk) 17:56, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:SUSTAINED. Brief bursts of news coverage may not sufficiently demonstrate notability. Similarly, not every speech or interview by a politician warrants its own article even if hundreds of daily newspapers cover it. Newspapers cover what's noteworthy today. Encyclopedias cover what's noteworthy now and in the future. --Animalparty! (talk) 21:19, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Only time will tell if the crash has lasting effects and continued coverage. Merge the crash story into the station article now and evaluate in a couple of years if the crash warrants a separate articleRuud Buitelaar (talk) 15:42, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. per nominator. --papageno (talk) 20:18, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support, the station is short enough to accommodate the crash in detail. The reason the crash is notable is the whale tails sculpture holding up.--Astral Leap (talk) 10:12, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support, nothing particularly notable about this crash to be described except for the scenery. If you look at Montparnasse derailment for example, there were passengers involved, a discussion on technical failures and a significant legacy section. Pieceofmetalwork (talk) 16:25, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support If the metro station article were long enough that it'd need to be split anyway I'd say no, but it's barely more than a stub. I agree the scenery of the crash is what made it so notable, and there's not much reporting into the other parts of it. Uses x (talk • {{reply to|Uses x}} • contribs) 13:59, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 23:12, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]