Talk:Davidson Township, Sullivan County, Pennsylvania

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Pennsylvania Mid‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dot maps[edit]

Not a dot problem this time, just a dot question. I haven't added the dot maps to the townships in Tioga County because I felt like the townships were too big for the dot. I am trying the dot here, but don't like it. I am looking for feedback. Dot map or not? My vote is not. Dincher (talk) 01:57, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I always assume not everyone knows where Sullivan County is within Pennsylvania, so I think the dot is useful for highlighting the county. I do prefer just the dot (no little name label beside it) when there is just one dot on a map. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 03:07, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

True, but the PA map with Sullivan County is in the template at the bottom. What about having that PA map in the infobox? I can live with or without the label. Dincher (talk) 03:09, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I like the maps some couties have, see for example Spring Township, Centre County, Pennsylvania. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 03:39, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I switched the maps. How does it look now? It's my preference.Dincher (talk) 22:05, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me. Thanks - btw, I have seen the Sullivan Co photo requests and will see what I can do. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 22:07, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Covered bridge[edit]

I have recently added a pic of a covered bridge to this article. I think I found some info on it here. Is this the correct bridge? Dincher (talk) 21:21, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Very nice pic. I am pretty sure it is the right bride as there are only three covered bridges in Sullivan County. This one is the Sonestown Covered Bridge and is on the NRHP and the form for it is here [1]. It is on my list of bridges to do, but feel free to jump in if you want. I have a picture of it too, but it is not nearly as nice as the one you found, thanks Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 21:34, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks. I fixed the caption. Will leave it alone for now. Dincher (talk) 21:41, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - I made some stubs and have a triple DYK idea - DYK ... that of the 30 covered bridges that once stood in Sullivan County, Pennsylvania, only three (Forksville, Hillsgrove, and Sonestown) remain, and that they were all built in 1850? Need to expand each. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 01:34, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Davidson Township, Sullivan County, Pennsylvania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:57, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]