Talk:David Hendricks

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Christianity: Anabaptist Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Anabaptist work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Trial section[edit]

The "trial" section was full of a lot of comments that were not cited and pure speculation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.215.126.6 (talk) 04:02, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where he is now[edit]

Does anyone know what became of Hendricks after his acquittal? Jeanie821 16:46, 6 May 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeanie821 (talk • contribs)

Worst article I've ever come across.[edit]

I can't believe what I just read. Could it be that David Hendricks himself wrote most of the ludicrous claims in the article? History.com is a reliable source and cites exactly why he was convicted; it's located here. MagnoliaSouth ^(talk) 23:03, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]