Talk:Danish International Logistical Center

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Danish International Logistical Center article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 February 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Military history: Logistics / European / Nordic

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military logistics and medicine task force
	European military history task force
	Nordic military history task force

Denmark Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comment[edit]

All of the acronyms should be written out. No one knows what they stand for and this isn't the united nations where we use this kind of terminology so no one knows what we're up to. ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:58, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, just don't leave the acronyms there, which already point to the pages you're linking to :) §FreeRangeFrog 05:05, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I put the acronyms back... the thing is just terrible with those spelled out. Seriously. No? And I mean, if someone wonders what they are, they can always just click the links. That's what they're for :) §FreeRangeFrog 05:34, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]