Talk:Daniell cell

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Energy

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Anode[edit]

Usually in all cells, the terminal undergoing oxidation is called the anode. Here, in a Daniel Cell, the Zinc terminal undergoes oxidation. And yet, it is the cathode. This is one speciality of a Daniel Cell.

No, it's not. The Zinc terminal is the anode. 24.6.66.193 07:14, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion[edit]

I have expanded this article by adding text from Wet cell. Biscuittin 11:59, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling[edit]

Sulphates and sulfates - the more accepted these days is to use 'f'. In the article there is 'ph' as well as 'f'. Change? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Number 8 (talk • contribs) 08:38, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Order of Sections[edit]

I found it odd when reading this article that the section about a variant (about the gravity cell), came before the description of the cell's chemistry. Would it not be more logical to explain the basic cell first before describing variants? Additionally, would it be possible to have both the 'Gravity Cell' and 'Porous Pot Cell' headings to be grouped into a 'Variations' or 'Types' section, as it is not immediately apparent that that is in fact what they are. Aamackie (talk) 23:59, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done, Spinning Spark 10:14, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

EMF[edit]

14.97.59.78 (talk) 16:37, 13 July 2011 (UTC) what is the average emf of the daniel cell? plzz help. anyone. i am at earnest...[reply]

This is now in the lede section of the article. Spinning Spark 10:14, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

deleted var spelling note[edit]

I can see no justification for flagging 'Daniel' as a variant spelling - a search shows almost all authoritative sources as Daniell. The single 'l' is erroneous and shouldn't be encouraged as an alternative or variant. Romit3 (talk) 19:03, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Illustration annotation[edit]

can we find an illustration of a cell that is not labelled in french? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.78.84.210 (talk) 00:07, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The two half-cell form of the Daniell cell for classroom demonstrationsZn(s) → Zn2+(aq) + 2e− . . (Standard electrode potential -0.7618 V )

At the cathode, copper is reduced per the following reaction: Cu2+(aq) + 2e− → Cu(s) . . (Standard electrode potential +0.340 V )Please delete or correct the diagram! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.228.16.225 (talk) 11:44, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The picture of the two half-cell form[edit]

The picture does not match the text in the Chemistry section. What ions are in the salt bridge? The text speaks of nitrate and potassium ions moving from the salt bridge into the solution, while in the picture zinc ions and sulfate ions move into the salt bridge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.142.61.36 (talk) 13:35, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Daniell cell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723211849/http://www.morsetelegraph.net/tools/tools4.html to http://www.morsetelegraph.net/tools/tools4.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:38, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chemistry section[edit]

Final paragraph appears to be missing a formula of some sort. 2A00:23C7:CA9B:801:35A4:1C99:4D77:2589 (talk) 18:17, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to be missing most of the article rather than the article missing a formula. The final paragraph is about electrotyping and ends "Credit for invention of electrotyping is usually given to the Russian Moritz von Jacobi". Can't see that that needs a formula. SpinningSpark 10:54, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, SS. To clarify, final paragraph of section 1 'Chemistry' reads

If the cell is connected to a potential source (e.g. a battery charger) such that the potential difference of the source is slightly higher than the cell emf (1.1 v) then the current flow could be reversed and the reaction would become:
Hence, the Daniell cell is reversible, if the current drawn from (or fed to) it is small. The Daniell cell can be used to ‘generate’ electricity, by consuming an electrode, or to store electricity

Rest of article looks OK. Issue occurs under both Firefox and Chrome. 2A00:23C7:CA9B:801:35A4:1C99:4D77:2589 (talk) 21:49, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was removed in this edit which appears to be vandalism. Now restored. SpinningSpark 12:31, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, SS. What a w****r. 2A00:23C7:CA9B:801:35A4:1C99:4D77:2589 (talk) 15:56, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ব্যবহার[edit]

ইলেকট্রিক মোটর গাড়িতে এই কোষ ব্যবহার করা হয়। এবং বিভিন্ন কলকারখানার বৈদ্যুতিক টেক্সটাইল মেশিনে কাজে লাগানো হয়। 2409:4060:2E99:60CB:169E:A9D8:C3:F7A0 (talk) 05:49, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ব্যবহার[edit]

ইলেকট্রিক মোটর গাড়িতে এই কোষ ব্যবহার করা হয়। এবং বিভিন্ন কলকারখানার বৈদ্যুতিক টেক্সটাইল মেশিনে কাজে লাগানো হয়। 2409:4060:2E99:60CB:169E:A9D8:C3:F7A0 (talk) 05:49, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ব্যবহার[edit]

ইলেকট্রিক মোটর গাড়িতে এই কোষ ব্যবহার করা হয়। এবং বিভিন্ন কলকারখানার বৈদ্যুতিক টেক্সটাইল মেশিনে কাজে লাগানো হয়। 2409:4060:2E99:60CB:169E:A9D8:C3:F7A0 (talk) 05:49, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]