Talk:Dani Ploeger

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notability[edit]

Article subject seems to have a basic level of notability per WP:GNG. It was created by a single purpose account, so I hope they know the rules on WP:COI and WP:OWN, if that were to apply in this case.New Media Theorist (talk) 00:45, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for your comments New Media Theorist. I thought the level of notability would be sufficient considering the independent sources provided (ARTE television, Times Higher Education supplement, TDR journal etc.), but will leave the article alone now for others to consider, as you suggested on your talk page. DX ArtMedia (talk) 01:27, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • No worries. Wikipedia operates on a general notability guideline that has little relation to anyone's opinion. It's all about proving significant coverage of the subject by independent reliable sources. In this case the question would probably be whether the coverage is significant enough. A lot of it also depends on how the different editors interpret "significant"! For example there's much more significant coverage, with more significant sources (e.g. major media,) of Tinkebell, which give her a high estimated rating on the Wikipedia notability scale (a thing that does not actually exist). Personally I think Dani Ploeger has a lot more substance to his work, but Wikipedia, going by sources, would likely rate him as less notable. In any case if you have questions, hit me up on my talk page! Happy to help.New Media Theorist (talk) 01:39, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks New Media Theorist, that is all very clear. I'd like to request an edit to consider whether notability is appropriate for inclusion DX ArtMedia (talk) 09:56, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • For neutrality's sake, we will have to wait to see if someone else removes it.New Media Theorist (talk) 17:04, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • PS: if you edit your comment to have the request header above, and the request "please remove notability tag as subject is notable" below, it may be dealt with more quickly as that's the normal format. New Media Theorist (talk) 17:09, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request to remove tag[edit]

Please remove notability tag as subject is notable. DX ArtMedia (talk) 22:42, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • there's no notability tag. It's a conflict of interest editing tag, to reflect that the page was created and edited by someone with a relationship to the article subject (i.e. you). It will be removed once someone else reads the article and sees fit to remove it.New Media Theorist (talk) 00:49, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am a curator and know the artist in this article through this role. A renewed request: I would like to request /either/ the removal of the conflict of interest tag (if the artist is found to be of sufficient notability and the article written in appropriately neutral style), /or/ nomination for deletion (if found insufficiently notable). DX ArtMedia (talk) 10:41, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See above. The tag warns readers that major contributions to the article were made by someone whose relationship with the subject creates a conflict of interest (i.e. you). It won't be removed until the article content is not mosty contributions that you have made. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:51, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

COI editing[edit]

I've undone edits by DX ArtMedia, who was warned about COI editing above but persists. New Media Theorist (talk) 23:32, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi New Media Theorist, apologies, I didn't think it would be a problem to clean up the entry after your edits to the format as the article is still flagged and will hopefully be checked for notability in due course. I reasoned that until the { {request edit} } has been performed it wouldn't make a difference, but I see that this is not the case :-). I'm not entirely familiar with all the ins and outs of the rules (and formats) yet. I'll read up on things and be more careful. DX ArtMedia (talk) 09:24, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for your comment. No worries. Check out this page, whcih covers what to do if you have a close connection to someone or something you are writing about.New Media Theorist (talk) 10:24, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dani Ploeger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:37, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dani Ploeger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:16, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Dani_Ploeger&oldid=1199786552"