Talk:Dan Poulter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I notice two separate editors references to a negative story (100 hours working time) that has received significant news coverage in relation to Dr Dan Poulter have now been rapidly removed from this page. I'm worried this is affecting the 'Neutral Point of View' position of this article, particularly as the negative story has been reported in multiple sources. (eg New Statesman / HSJ). Also, on both occasions, the edits have left a very promotional quote as the final comment on the article, which should equally be deleted if we are avoiding personal discussion as part of this biography stub.

Would there be any way the editor who has removed the reference both times be happy for this reference to be included, and does anyone else think it should be included? - eg an expanded section with the reference from the Hansard, and Dr Poulter's subsequent response. I didn't include this detail, as I thought it would change the weight of the article and over focus on it. Happy to add an extended comment with referenced quotes from both points of view on the issue. Quesh 08:52, 19 September 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrQuesh (talkcontribs)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Daniel Poulter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:18, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]