Talk:Dalki

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was no consensus for move. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 20:58, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dalki → Dalki (village) — Current name obstructs navigation from recently created page "Dalki (cartoon)". --Morganthegreat (talk) 13:38, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The question is which is primary topic. Dalki (cartoon) has been only viewed a grand total of two times, so it is premature to say that navigation is impeded. The normal thing to do when there are only two is to use a hat note, which has been done from this article. 199.125.109.102 (talk) 15:24, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Such a move would only be appropriate if it were obvious that the cartoon was the primary topic, which it isn't. Tevildo (talk) 16:56, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. In any case, the proper disambiguation would be Dalki, Poland per WP:MOSPOL#Towns and villages. Station1 (talk) 05:21, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Good point. Andrewa (talk) 07:25, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The hatnote is quite adequate for navigation. No evidence that the cartoon is the primary topic. Andrewa (talk) 07:24, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.