Talk:Dalit Christian

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What is this "dalit" "christian"?[edit]

Dalit is one of the four varnas from the hindu caste system. Since when did christianity adopt the hindu caste system?

This seems like an artificial creation by a few christian orgs in india just to get reservations for jobs. I don't think the vatican or protestant sects outside india have ever heard of the caste system being a part of christianity. Please stop the lying. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.52.127.132 (talk) 12:01, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bias[edit]

This article seems to be written in a very biased fashion. Someone with more knowledge of the subject than I have and with less bias than the author should edit it. JediScougale (talk) 01:06, 26 November 2008 (UTC) (talk) 01:05, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the NPOV template to flag this article. While my knowledge of the subject is lacking, I agree that it is written in POV terms, using only a single source, and is quite redundant besides. I would do this myself, but I really do not feel qualified to write on this topic. --kajermtalk 13:40, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar[edit]

Just want to let anybody who cares know that all I've done is touch up the grammar. I've left the topic itself alone. --Daydreamer302000 (talk) 12:17, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Modern Challenges[edit]

The site referred to as resource is only similar to a Blog. It is not a recognised or accredited news source. I think some propaganda initiative is evident here. I propose to edit away this section. Please discuss. Goodhindu (talk) 04:11, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.articlesbase.com/politics-articles/dalit-christian-demands-2690491.html
    Triggered by \barticles(?:base|vana)\.com\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 17:14, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 05:57, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Dalit Christian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:55, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dalit Christian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:32, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Abhishek0831996 edits[edit]

I reverted those edits because you made a false edit summery, they re[resented the sources faithfully and you edits just removed information that was unfavrable to those that want to maintain the cast system. Hardyplants (talk) 19:02, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong. I was indeed fixing the misrepresentation you are doing with this source, by hyping Protestant opposition to caste system in your edits as more of a general stance when they appear to have worked for a caste-less Christian society, than overall caste-less society. This is all not entirely accurate as detailed in my edit which you removed without explanation.
You misrepresented this source by ignoring the paragraph "dalits also face discrimination from those regarded as upper caste Christians".
You are misrepresenting this source which says:
  • "Today no Indian Christian thinker would approve or even speak of tolerating the caste reality. There are many, however, who live in it."
But you are presenting it as:
  • "No Christian thinker in India now accepts the cast system and Dalit Christians have either rejected their Dalit roots and see themselves as new creations in the language of the New Testament; or they maintain their Dalit roots in a wish to stand in solidarity with other Dalits, no matter their religion, to claim recognition and equal dignity in society."
Scroll.in is an unreliable source, per WP:RSN,[1] yet you used it.[2]
What "South Asia State of Minorities Report 2020" has to do with this subject "Dalit Christian" in hand which you added here?
I left a larger note on your talk page. Abhishek0831996 (talk) 17:15, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Context matters, note the flow of the text is within the different branches of the Christians communities: "The different branches of Christianity in India still engage in these societal practices with regards to the caste system, along with all its customs and norms, to varying degrees depending on the particular sect. Within the three major Christian branches in India, there were historically and are currently different levels of caste acceptance. The Protestant churches have most consistently repudiated the caste system, rejecting it as a Hindu construct, and have made the greatest attempt to establish a caste-less community. The Roman Catholic Church is said to sometimes develop a more culturally consistent view, treating the caste system as part of the Indian social structure and, for much of its history in India; similarly, the Syrian Orthodox Churches have sometimes responded in like fashion, except it has tended to collectively act as one caste within the caste system instead of maintaining different castes within their churches." Hardyplants (talk) 18:02, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Go back and read the texts again that is covered abundantly already. see: "Dalit Christians have frequently criticized the Church for not just tolerating but hiding the discriminatory practices among Dalit Christians. In the 1990s there were protests against those Christian organizations that still practiced some form of the caste system and for discrimination in leadership positions; Dalits saw those practices as contrary to Jesus's egalitarianism. In 2020 The National Council of Dalit Christians (NCDC) appealed to the catholic church, the apostolic nuncio and the Pope "...to curb visible and invisible untouchability practices" that exist in selection of Bishops." and No Christian thinker in India now accepts the cast system and Dalit Christians have either rejected their Dalit roots and see themselves as new creations in the language of the New Testament; or they maintain their Dalit roots in a wish to stand in solidarity with other Dalits, no matter their religion, to claim recognition and equal dignity in society.[1] and "Even so many are still trapped in the cast system.[1] Hindus still see Dalit Christians as Dalits and treat them as such with violence and discrimination, the state also discriminates against them by excluding them from the reservation program, and those Christians that think of themselves as upper cast discriminate against Dalit Christians within the churches.[2]" (talk) 17:54, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Did you not see this text? "Even so many are still trapped in the cast system.[1] Hindus still see Dalit Christians as Dalits and treat them as such with violence and discrimination, the state also discriminates against them by excluding them from the reservation program, and those Christians that think of themselves as upper cast discriminate against Dalit Christians within the churches.[2] Hardyplants (talk) 18:31, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have no problem removing that source if it has been found wanting but in this case the information is true. Hardyplants (talk)
This point outs the issues facing this group of people: "The South Asia State of Minorities Report 2020 has found that since the BJP (the Indian people's party) has returned to political power in May 0f 2018 “Hate crimes against minorities have seen a spike – taking the form of mob lynching and vigilante violence against Muslims, Christians, and Dalits. BJP also strengthened and expanded a series of discriminatory laws and measures that target religious minorities. These include anti-conversion laws, blamed by human rights groups for empowering Hindutva groups to conduct campaigns of harassment, social exclusion and violence against Christians, Muslims, and other religious minorities across the country’.60 Laws ostensibly meant for the protection of cows continue to provide institutional backing for similar campaigns against Muslims and Dalits.” Hardyplants (talk) 17:54, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Looking over your edit history it is clear that you are the one that is pushing a POV, a nationalistic Hindu one. I have included all those points in the page that you say I have left out. If Scroll I no good I have no problem leaving that out. The other sources are good but you do not like them because they do not show a favorable light on the cast systems and Indian society. Hardyplants (talk) 18:02, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see if you have addressed any of the points raised above, regarding your misrepresentation of sources and adding reports that have nothing to do with this subject. Adding a one-sided report without mentioning the other side from the unrelated subject in question is WP:DE. Wareon (talk) 03:50, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Casting aspersions by users above are not helpful. If scroll.in is not reliable we should take it WP:RSN. Otherwise, Abhishek0831996 do you have a better wording of the content Hardyplants was inserting? These two sources look reliable.VR talk 20:01, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • None mentions "Dalit Christian" thus both are wholly irrelevant for this article. Wareon (talk) 03:50, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ a b c Leonard Fernando; G. Gispert-Sauch (2004). Christianity in India: Two Thousand Years of Faith. Penguin Books India. pp. 188–. ISBN 978-0-670-05769-6.
  2. ^ a b Rowena Robinson; Joseph Marianus Kujur (17 August 2010). Margins of Faith: Dalit and Tribal Christianity in India. SAGE Publications. pp. 11–. ISBN 978-81-321-0604-3.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Dalit_Christian&oldid=1204127382"