Talk:D'Agostino's K-squared test

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Clarification?[edit]

The early notation needs to be changed so that it distinguishes properly between μ for population values and m for sample values, similarly for σ. Also what version of the sample variance is to be used? 193.62.153.194 (talk) 10:28, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Test statistic?[edit]

I'm a little confused about the test statistic. I've applied this test to a vector of random numbers, generated by MathCAD as being normally distributed. Assuming my algebra is correct I reject the nul hypothesis if I compare K^2 against the Chi^2 distribution (95% significance with 2 degrees of freedom). This obviously troubles me. I fail to reject the nul hypothesis (quite convincingly, P value 0.77) if I compare K against the the Chi^2 distribution.

I have K^2=8.7 (K=2.95), Critical value(0.95,2)=5.991 - so it's an unlikely event.

Clarification is requested.155.198.66.7 (talk) 15:17, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just ran this test, for a sample of size n = 100 the test statistic K² has mean of 2.014 and standard deviation of 2.261 (versus theoretical 2.0 and 2.0) over B = 100,000 simulations. For a sample size n = 1000 i obtained mean = 1.995 and standard deviation = 2.023 (with 10,000 simulations). So you either made an error in coding, or got very unlucky.  … stpasha »  00:41, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
An online paper at http://eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/15/b6/00.pdf may serve to validate your results. Melcombe (talk) 12:10, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on D'Agostino's K-squared test. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:30, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]