Talk:CzechTek

This article really needs some more research. To be fair and balanced, the fact that the festival is always held under an air of illegality and non-transparency should be noted. Also, regarding this years incident, the owner of the field the rave was held in stated that he was lied to about the event and the number of people attending. This should also be included.

TruthCrysader

Not really, the police has said so (also that he denied his approval, and that it was for 150 people) but it wasn't true. Here's his testimony at the police station. http://www.policejnistat.cz/Informujeme/Clanky/PAROUBEK-LZE,-MAME-VIPOVEI-PANA-PLESKY-3.html

This is all fairly well documented on the Czech Wikipedia Czechtek pages (for example, however secrecy does surround Czechtek, there were only 3 out of 12 Czechteks on land without approval), maybe somebody could translate it..?

Also, about the last edit and the WC's - at least in 2003 and 2004 there were mobile toilets, look for pictures from Czechtek 2003/4. This year, the WC's were on the way and there's even statement from the WC company confirming this, but the police has blocked them (as well as many other cars going to Czechtek). On the other hand, there probably wasn't tens of the WCs like on commercial multi-day festivals like Czech Love Planet. Then again, most people go to Czechtek for first 1-2 days only, so there's not that much need to.. Ahem. :-)

PS Probably in 2002 there were WC's too: http://zpravy.idnes.cz/nazory.asp?r=nazory&c=A020730_162106_nazory_slu

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on CzechTek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mvcr.cz/zpravy/2005/mlynec.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930205156/http://praguepost.com/P03/2005/Art/0804/news3.php to http://praguepost.com/P03/2005/Art/0804/news3.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:26, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on CzechTek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120711001542/http://bloguje.czechtek.net/ to http://bloguje.czechtek.net/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:17, 7 January 2018 (UTC)