Talk:Cymreigyddion y Fenni

Languages Low‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wales

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Celts

	Cymreigyddion y Fenni is within the scope of WikiProject Celts, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the ancient Celts and the modern day Celtic nations. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks or take part in the discussion. Please Join, Create, and Assess.CeltsWikipedia:WikiProject CeltsTemplate:WikiProject CeltsCelts articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Edits made by the below user were last checked for neutrality on 25 March 2024 by DankJae.

Cymreigydd-y-Fenni (talk · contribs)

[Untitled][edit]

In addition to being unremarkable, the only source listed "official website," doesn't appear to link to a website that is related to this organization (it links to a school website with no discernible connection). This needs more independent sources to prove notability. -- a kendall 14:57, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because the claim is unfounded, it might lack citations though. — Cymreigydd-y-Fenni (talk) 14:58, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It lacks any citations, and has no independent sources. -- a kendall 14:59, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Google search? The weblink has now been corrected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cymreigydd-y-Fenni (talk • contribs) 15:02, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the update. But this link (Official Website), through my Google Translate, since it's in Welsh, doesn't appear to support the details on this page, or assert the notability of this organization. If there are other sources that can be found though a Google search, perhaps you can properly cite them on the page? See WP:CITE. -- a kendall 15:05, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

3 new links added, baptism by fire or what?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cymreigydd-y-Fenni (talk • contribs) 15:11, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There are quite a few mentions of this society on Google Books, many of them in English, some of which appear to be non-trivial. Moreover, an article about this group has existed over on the Welsh language Wikipedia for some time now without much fuss. Are their inclusion guidelines much different to those of the English language Wikipedia? --Several Pending (talk) 15:40, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Being new I don't know whether it's possible to get an opinion from other editors? Maybe ones with Welsh interests? (User:Deb or User:Enaidmawr maybe) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cymreigydd-y-Fenni (talk • contribs) 15:51, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cymreigyddion y Fenni. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:54, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]