Talk:Cyclone Fanele

Cyclone Fanele has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 1, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed

Weather: Tropical / Southern Hemisphere Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Southern Hemisphere work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[tropical cyclone scales#South-Western Indian Ocean|tropical cyclone status]] The anchor (#South-Western Indian Ocean) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cyclone Fanele/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Having read through, and questioned a few things over the last few weeks i feel confident that this article passes GAN. Jason Rees (talk) 03:07, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Cyclone Fanele. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://weather.noaa.gov/pub/data/raw/ab/abio10.pgtw..txt
Corrected formatting/usage for http://weather.noaa.gov/pub/data/raw/wt/wtxs22.pgtw..txt
Corrected formatting/usage for http://weather.noaa.gov/pub/data/raw/wt/wtio30.fmee..txt
Corrected formatting/usage for http://weather.noaa.gov/pub/data/raw/wt/wtxs32.pgtw..txt
Corrected formatting/usage for http://weather.noaa.gov/pub/data/raw/wt/wtxs32.pgtw..txt
Corrected formatting/usage for http://weather.noaa.gov/pub/data/raw/wt/wtxs32.pgtw..txt
Corrected formatting/usage for http://weather.noaa.gov/pub/data/raw/wt/wtxs32.pgtw..txt
Corrected formatting/usage for http://weather.noaa.gov/pub/data/raw/wt/wtxs32.pgtw..txt
Corrected formatting/usage for http://weather.noaa.gov/pub/data/raw/wt/wtxs32.pgtw..txt
Corrected formatting/usage for http://weather.noaa.gov/pub/data/raw/wt/wtxs32.pgtw..txt

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:11, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]