Talk:Cusack

France C‑class Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Anthroponymy

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthroponymyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthroponymyTemplate:WikiProject AnthroponymyAnthroponymy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Lhynard, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 2009-09-17.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Untitled[edit]

This entire page is a mess, the author of this page should clean it up, make the text meaningful, explain the text on this page or delete most of it. As it is, the article is worthless and very confusing. (Comment posted by RedmanToby (talk | contribs), April 13, 2008)

I've restored the above comment after it was deleted by another editor. While its tone may be intemperate, a glance at the state of the article at time of posting will confirm its general accuracy. --Yumegusa (talk) 16:36, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio removal[edit]

In the section "Famous historical Cusacks", the entire paragraph beginning, "During the period of Catholic resurgence under James II" is a direct copy from p.108 of Irish Families: Their Names, Arms, and Origins, by Edward MacLysaght (Figgis, 1972), so I've removed it.--Yumegusa (talk) 23:34, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More. The paragraph beginning "The first Cusacks, Geoffrey and Andre de Cusack" is also a direct copy from the same page of the above book.--Yumegusa (talk) 00:05, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And more. The paragraph beginning, "Although the Cusacks are not closely associated" is a direct copy from p.109 of the same book, and has now been removed. --Yumegusa (talk) 22:40, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Major cleanup[edit]

I have radically edited this article which in its earlier state was a calamity. The "Famous historical Cusacks" section remains problematical. I have had difficulty finding references via Google Books or the web to provide any support for the list items, which begs the question just how 'famous' they are. I will continue to dig, but if nothing has been found within 2 months I will delete the section, and whoever can provide references may remake it. All assistance -if anybody's watching- greatly appreciated. --Yumegusa (talk) 21:35, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal[edit]

Both articles talk about the Cusack family. Sole Soul (talk) 21:11, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Yumegusa (talk) 23:21, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Might I suggest that this piece on Cusack have the de Cusack contrubution merged with it to give more content and info to it. What are your views? C.Cleeve (talk) 11:57, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I SUPPORT the merger. C.Cleeve (talk) 12:27, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did a full-content paste merger, needs cleanup. Sole Soul (talk) 03:10, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sole Soul, Thank you for doing the merger. I (and I'm sure that I can include Yumegusa) appreciate your help in that. I will see about a sorting a cleanup however am still awaiting clearence to include photographs etc. Once again thanks for your invaluable assistance.C.Cleeve (talk) 10:35, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's my pleasure. What do you mean by clearance? Sole Soul (talk) 10:59, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sole Soul, What I mean by 'clearance' is that I have written to the Author and the Society of the publications I've referenced for permission to reproduce pictures from the publications to illustrate the piece - the castle, a map & Sir Tom's 4 Stones. Regards C.Cleeve (talk) 19:28, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

IMAGE UPLOADING[edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page.

Hi Sole Soul when I last messaged you, months ago, I was off to seek permission for the use of the images. Have got OK for all eight and started to upload them - the first one to see if it worked! I thought that I'd got it right as 'deCusack_Sign.jpg' appeared on Wiki. I then edited 'Cusack' and put in

File:DeCusack Sign.Jpeg

Cussac Le Vieux, Aquitaine, France

but while the words appeared there was no photo above it. Tried to find the image again but could not, so reloaded it found 'it' was still there (where ever 'there' is). Tried again without success. Saw the message which appears not to like the clearence I'd given. Have not tried to upload any more till I find the answer. Can you are others advise?

C.Cleeve (talk) 16:27, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1. Get the name right - you have Jpeg in the link it should be jpg (and watch the case J is not that same as j)

2. It got deleted - 17:01, 1 November 2010 Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry deleted "File:DeCusack Sign.jpg" ‎ (F3: Media file with improper license)

Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:51, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image message from its history[edit]

The use of this file is permitted only on Wikipedia.

Dear uploader: This media file, which you just uploaded, has been listed for speedy deletion because you indicated that only Wikipedia has permission to use this file. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, since explicit permission to use it was given, this is in fact not the case. [1] [2] Please do not upload any more files with this restriction on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it. See our non-free content guidelines for more information.

If you created this media file and want it to be kept on Wikipedia, remove this message and replace this with {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want it to be used on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may replace this message with one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Thanks for the help. I'll try and get it right next time - possibly tomorrow! C.Cleeve (talk) 17:14, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You[edit]

Thank you - Sole Soul and RonhJones also Wikipedia - for your help and guidance in enabling me to share a few facts about that original Norman Knight, Geoffrey and his early Irish decendants, with his Worldwide Cusack family of today. I hope that those, who bother to read it, will find something of interest in it. C.Cleeve (talk) 15:31, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Crest & Location of Aquitaine[edit]

The location of Aquitaine in the picture is, I believe, incorrect. Aquitaine is in the south west of France, not as centralised as shown in the image. Also I believe there needs to be more reference towards the Cusack crest as there is a more common and widely used version. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paddy Eire (talk • contribs) 07:51, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aquitaine is a large area. Viewing the current map and the map from Cussac, Haute-Vienne at the same time, is not easy, as one is a representation of France and the other a true map - some 9deg rotation of this map is required and a bit of non-linear stretch - then Cussac, Haute-Vienne, is just (but only just) above the red square - a reasonable agreement. In any case any dispute of the picture must be held at the picture's talk page, not here. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:31, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Location, Crest & Epitaph Update[edit]

Thank you for your observations. Ref the position on the map of 'cussac' and 'Aquitaine' (by association) if you clk on the map and on talk 'Tomcusack' you will see that the map was produced in 2007 and that I had requested a correction in 2010. The Mermaid Crest is that which appears on the stones of circa 1571 and in the references shown. I'd be interested to see the evidence (earlier if possible) of the 'more common and widely used' version. Please add to the article this other one and where/when recorded etc. Ref the request for a citation against the Epitaph - I thought that the citation in 'Stone No 4' and the reference to Prof.R.M.Gwynn's translation was sufficent. However if further proof be needed the research papers of the historian E.Hickey are archived in Trinity College, Dublin and I can ref these if required. Your comments and advice are welcome. C.Cleeve (talk) 15:32, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cusack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131230233328/http://cdn.tradebit.org/usr/heraldics/pub/9002/cusack-coat-of-arms.jpg to http://cdn.tradebit.org/usr/heraldics/pub/9002/cusack-coat-of-arms.jpg

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:53, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]