Talk:Cuche Formation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cuche Formation/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: FunkMonk (talk · contribs) 14:49, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I have never reviewed an article about a geological formation before, but that's perhaps because few have ever been nominated... FunkMonk (talk) 14:49, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • First, the image layout seems messy, there is no good reason to enlarge all the photos, and one, like the map, could be moved into the taxobox as lead-image to make the rest of the article less crammed. Not sure why that globe should be in the infobox, though, it is not specifically about this formation.
  • The white space at the bottom doesn't look very good, it should be possible to eliminate it. Some images may have to be removed.
  • It seems like an oversight that you don't have detailed sections about anything other than fishes. If other organisms are found, they should be given as much weight in the article.
  • I'm not sure the Indus River image is really that relevant here, especially since it supposedly isn't even important enough to mention it by name in the caption.
  • Here's a ping, Tisquesusa, in case you didn't see the bot notification of this review. FunkMonk (talk) 01:20, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like the article writer last edited in October and there's been no activity since, so unfortunately this should probably be closed for the time being. Wizardman 22:47, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I'll do it soon. But note the nominator has more nominations up. Something should be done to them. FunkMonk (talk) 22:01, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I really hope Tisquesusa comes back and addresses the issues so that this can be promoted – I very much appreciated someone else working on Colombia articles, and someone knowledgeable and on serious subjects to boot. Richard3120 (talk) 16:29, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]